HomeCirculars › RBI/2004-05/480

PPF Scheme 1968: Clarifications on Juristic Person Accounts

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 22 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 25 May 2005  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 21 Jun 2026, 09:02 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI clarifies that PPF accounts opened by juristic persons (HUFs, trusts, etc.) on or after May 13, 2005, are void and must be closed with deposit refunds (no interest). Existing accounts continue normally but extensions are subject to new rules.

What changed

Government amendments effective May 13, 2005, restrict small savings scheme investments to individuals only. Any PPF accounts opened by juristic persons (like HUFs, trusts, provident funds) on or after that date are considered void ab initio and must be closed immediately with principal refunded but no interest paid.

What it means for you

Banks must identify and close any PPF accounts opened by non-individuals after May 13, 2005, without paying interest. Existing accounts opened before that date remain valid until maturity, but any extension of such accounts will follow the new restrictive rules. This tightens compliance and prevents misuse of PPF by entities.

What you must do

Who it affects

Banks operating PPF accounts (SBI, associate banks, and other listed public sector banks), Juristic persons (HUFs, trusts, provident funds) who opened PPF accounts on or after May 13, 2005, Individual PPF account holders with existing accounts

What happens to PPF accounts opened by HUFs or trusts after May 13, 2005?

They are considered void from the start. Banks must close them and refund the deposit without any interest.

Can existing PPF accounts of juristic persons continue?

Yes, accounts opened before May 13, 2005, can continue until maturity as per old rules. But any extension of such accounts will be subject to the new amendments.

Are joint accounts by individuals affected?

No, the restriction applies only to juristic persons. Individual accounts (single or joint) and guardian accounts for minors/unsound mind are not affected.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 21 Jun 2026, 09:02 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2290&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.