HomeCirculars › https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=62962

RBI fines Sarvodaya Commercial Co-op Bank for inoperative account rule breach

Deposits / Interest RatesCo-operative Banks
Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 00:12 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI imposed a ₹20,000 penalty on Sarvodaya Commercial Co-operative Bank for levying penal charges on minimum balance shortfalls in certain inoperative accounts, violating RBI's revised instructions on inoperative accounts/unclaimed deposits.

What changed

RBI's statutory inspection with reference to the bank's financial position as on March 31, 2025 revealed that the bank had levied penal charges for non-maintenance of minimum balances in certain inoperative accounts. This contravened RBI's directions on 'Inoperative Accounts / Unclaimed Deposits in Banks - Revised Instructions'. After a show-cause notice and personal hearing, RBI sustained the charge and imposed the penalty by an order dated May 29, 2026.

What it means for you

This penalty underscores RBI's strict stance on protecting depositors' interests, especially regarding inoperative accounts. Banks must ensure they do not impose charges on such accounts beyond what RBI permits. For lenders, it's a reminder to audit their inoperative account handling processes to avoid similar regulatory action, even for small amounts.

What you must do

Who it affects

Sarvodaya Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd., All co-operative banks in India, Banks with inoperative accounts or unclaimed deposits

What specific rule did Sarvodaya Commercial Co-operative Bank violate?

The bank levied penal charges for non-maintenance of minimum balances in certain inoperative accounts, which goes against RBI's revised instructions on inoperative accounts and unclaimed deposits.

How much was the penalty and under what legal provision?

The penalty was ₹20,000, imposed under Section 47A(1)(c) read with Sections 46(4)(i) and 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

Does this penalty affect the validity of the bank's customer transactions?

No, RBI clarified that the action is based on regulatory compliance deficiencies and is not intended to pronounce on the validity of any transaction or agreement with customers.

Key dataSee the live numbers behind this topic: Repo Rate Timeline, Credit & Deposit Growth, RBI Penalty Tracker — updated from official RBI data.
Key termsPlain-English definitions of terms in this circular — see the full Indian banking glossary. Repo rate · CASA · Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) · Deposit insurance (DICGC)
Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 00:12 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=62962 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.