HomeCirculars › RBI/2004-05/488

RBI Revises Board Review Calendar for Public Sector Banks

No longer current — replaced by RBI Revises Board Review Calendar for Public Sector Banks
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2004-05/488 · issued 10 Jun 2005 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI has reduced the number of mandatory board reviews by leveraging committee work, effective July 1, 2005. The revised calendar specifies critical minimum reviews for Board, Management Committee, and Audit Committee, with banks free to add more as needed.

What changed

RBI revised the calendar of reviews for public sector banks, reducing the total number of mandatory reviews by leveraging the work of board committees. The basic structure from the 2000 calendar is retained, but the focus is on present-day concerns. The revised schedule takes effect from July 1, 2005.

What it means for you

Banks can now streamline board meetings by relying more on committee reports, reducing the burden on boards. The calendar sets a critical minimum, allowing banks flexibility to add reviews as needed. This shift encourages more strategic discussions on market trends, regulatory changes, and risk management.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All public sector banks, Board of Directors, Management Committee, Audit Committee

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is the effective date for the revised calendar?

The revised calendar of reviews comes into force from July 1, 2005.

Can banks add more reviews beyond the minimum specified?

Yes, the calendar outlines critical minimum requirements, and bank boards have discretion to prescribe additional reviews to suit their needs.

What happens if a review cannot be placed on time?

A note must be submitted to the board explaining the reasons for delay and when the review is proposed to be placed.

📜 This document’s life story (2 recorded events, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Superseded by RBI Revises Board Review Calendar for Public Sector Banks
RBI’s words: “Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.96/21.03.038/2004-05 dated June 10, 2005 advising Calendar of Reviews”
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2822: DBOD.No.BP.BC.96/21.03.038/2004-05 — "Revised Calendar of Reviews" dated June 10, 2005”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2004-05/488 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 96/21.03.038/2004-05 June 10, 2005 The Chief Executives of All Public Sector Banks Dear Sir, Revised Calendar of Reviews Please refer to our circularDBOD.No.BP.BC. 3/21.03.038/2000 dated July 14, 2000 advising Calendar of Reviews to be submitted to the Board and Management Committee of the bank. 2. In view of reports of increasing burden on Boards of banks on account of the calendar of reviews to be undertaken by them and to ensure that the calendar of reviews reflects the present day concerns, the calendar items have been reviewed. While retaining the basic structure of the calendar issued in the year 2000, the total number of reviews have been reduced by leveraging the work of the several committees of the boards. The revised calendar of reviews to be put up to the Board, Management Committee and Audit Committee are detailed in Annex I, to III ( Annex I , Annex II , Annex III ). It is emphasised that the above calendar outlines the critical minimum requirements of review and the bank Boards will have discretion to prescribe additional reviews to suit their requirements. 3. The revised schedule may please be brought into force with effect from 1st July 2005. If for any particular reason it is not possible to place the memorandum as per the calendar before the Board in the month it is due, a note should be put up to the Board giving reasons for the delay and when the review is proposed to be placed before the Board. 4. Please acknowledge receipt. Yours faithfully, (Anand Sinha) Chief General Manager-In-Charge Annexure - I Revised Calendar of Reviews to be put up to the Board Every Board Meeting 1 Funds Management A report on Funds and Treasury Management including derivatives giving the position as on the last reporting Friday of every month from the previous Board meeting. The report should contain summary of the total purchase/sales transactions without transaction-wise details. Compliance with CRR/SLR requirements may also be reported. The review should give an overview on deposit growth and also look at the achievement of investment policy objectives. 2 Position Report A Report giving details of Deposits, Advances, Investments, C-D Ratio, NPAs, Recovery thereof, etc. as on last reporting Friday. Compliance in respect of outstanding observations of the Board, adherence to exposure norms may also be included. The Report should not be a fact sheet but should capture qualitative data on the important market trends, market developments, regulatory initiatives, etc. between the review periods and should stimulate constructive suggestions and discussions on critical appraisal of the strategies followed presently and the need for changes. 3 Compliance Reporting The Compliance Reporting may be made on an exception basis. 4 Reports from Committees of the Board The Board may consider reports from Management Committee, Audit Committee and Committees on Risk Management. Reports from Compensation and Nomination Committees, etc. may be put up to the Board as and when developments take place
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2004-05/488 · issued 10 Jun 2005. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2285&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗