HomeCirculars › RBI/2005-06/155

RBI Expands Gold Loan Access for Domestic Jewellery Makers

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/155 · issued 05 Sep 2005 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI now allows nominated banks authorized to import gold to extend Gold (Metal) Loans to domestic jewellery manufacturers (non-exporters) for up to 90 days, with interest linked to international gold rates. These loans count toward the 25% Tier I capital ceiling for aggregate borrowing for non-export purposes.

What changed

Previously, Gold (Metal) Loans were restricted to jewellery exporters only. Now, nominated banks authorized to import gold can also lend to domestic jewellery manufacturers who are not exporters, subject to a 90-day tenor and other conditions. Additionally, non-nominated banks can issue stand-by LCs or bank guarantees for these domestic jewellery manufacturers only, denominated in INR.

What it means for you

Banks can now tap a new borrower segment—domestic jewellery manufacturers—for gold loans, potentially expanding their lending portfolio. However, these loans must be carefully managed within the 25% Tier I capital ceiling for aggregate borrowing for non-export purposes, and banks must ensure strict end-use monitoring and KYC compliance. The 90-day limit and international gold interest linkage add operational discipline.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

Nominated banks authorized to import gold, Non-nominated scheduled commercial banks issuing stand-by LCs/BGs, Domestic jewellery manufacturers (non-exporters), Jewellery exporters (existing arrangements unchanged)

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

How are these loans treated under capital adequacy norms?

They are subject to normal reserve requirements, capital adequacy, and other prudential norms, and count toward the 25% Tier I capital ceiling for aggregate borrowing for non-export purposes.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2758: DBOD.No.IBD.BC.33/23.67.001/2005-06 — "Gold (Metal) Loan" dated September 5, 2005”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2005-06/155 DBOD.No.IBD.BC. 33 /23.67.001/2005-06 September 5, 2005 All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs ) Dear Sir, Gold (Metal) Loan In terms of our circular DBOD.No.IBS.BC/1519/23.67.001/1998-99 dated December 31,1998, nominated banks authorized to import gold were advised that Gold (Metal) loans should be given only to jewellery exporters. Further, in terms of our circular DBOD.No.IBS.3161/23.67.001/1998-99 dated June 25,1999, nominated banks were advised that they may extend Gold (Metal) Loans also to the jewellery exporters who are the customers of other non-nominated banks by accepting a stand-by Letter of Credit (SBLC) or Bank Guarantee (BG) issued by their bankers subject to nominated banks’ own norms for lending and the conditions stipulated in our circular dated December 31,1998 referred to above. 2. We have been receiving requests from nominated banks to permit them to extend Gold (Metal) loans out of the gold imported by them to domestic jewellery manufacturers. It has been decided that, in order to liberalise the scheme further, banks nominated to import gold as per extant instructions may extend Gold (Metal) Loans to domestic jewellery manufacturers, who are not exporters of jewellery, subject to the condition that any gold loan borrowing / or other non funded commitments taken by them for the purpose of providing gold loans to domestic jewellery manufacturers will be taken into account for the purpose of overall ceiling ( presently 25 % of Tier I capital) in respect of aggregate borrowing for non-export purposes. The Gold Loans extended to exporters of jewellery would continue to be out of the 25% ceiling. The Gold (Metal) Loans provided by banks will be subject to the following conditions: i. The tenor of the gold loan for the domestic jewellery manufacturers should not exceed 90 days.- ii. Interest charged to the borrowers should be linked to the international gold interest rate. iii. The gold borrowings will be subject to normal reserve requirements. iv. The loan will be subject to capital adequacy and other prudential requirements. v. Banks should ensure end-use of gold loans to jewellery manufacturers and adhere to KYC guidelines. vi. Any mismatch arising out of the gold borrowings and lendings should be within the prudential risk limits approved by the nominated bank’s Board. vii. The banks should carefully assess the overall risks on granting gold loans and lay down a detailed lending policy with the approval of the Board. 3. Presently, nominated banks can extend Gold (Metal) Loans to exporters of jewellery who are customers of other scheduled commercial banks, by accepting stand-by letter of credit or bank guarantee issued by their bankers in favour of the nominated banks subject to authorised banks' own norms for lending and other conditions stipulated by RBI. As a further liberalisation measure, it has been decided to extend the facility to domestic jewellery manufacturers also, subject to the following conditions. i. The stand-by LC / BG shall be extended only on behalf of domestic jewellery manufacturers and shall cover at all times the full value of the quantity of gold borrowed by these entities. The stand-by LC/BG shall be issued by scheduled commercial banks in favour of a nominated bank ( list appended) only and not to any other entity which may otherwise be having permission to import gold. ii. The bank issuing the stand-by LC / BG (only inland letter of credit / bank guarantee) should do so only after carrying out proper credit appraisal. The bank should ensure that adequate margin is available to it at all times consistent with the volatility of the gold prices. iii. The stand-by LC / BG facilities will be denominated in Indian Rupees and not in foreign currency. iv. Stand-by LC / BG issued by the non-nominated banks will be subject to extant capital adequacy and prudential norms. v. The banks issuing stand-by LC / BG should also carefully assess the overall risks on granting these facilities and lay down a detailed lending policy with the approval of their Board. 4. The nominated banks may continue to extend Gold (Metal) Loans to jewellery exporters in terms of DBOD circulars dated December 31, 1998 and June 25, 1999 mentioned in paragraph 1 above. 5 . It is clarified that: a. The exposure assumed by the nominated bank extending the Gold (Metal) Loan against the stand-by LC / BG of another bank will be deemed as an exposure on the guaranteeing bank and attract appropriate risk weight as per the extant guidelines. b. The transaction should be purely on back-to-back basis i.e. the nominated banks should extend Gold (Metal) Loan directly to the customer of a non-nominated bank, against the stand-by LC / BG issued by the latter. c. Gold (Metal) Loans should not involve any direct or indirect liability of the borrowing entity towards foreign suppliers of gold. d. The banks may calculate their exposure and compliance with prudential norms daily by converting into Rupee the gold quantity by crossing London AM fixing for Gold/US Dollar rate with the rupee-dollar reference rate announced by RBI. 6. It is also clarified that there will be no change in the existing policy on lending against bullion. 7. Banks should recognise the overall risks in extending Gold (Metal) Loans as also in extending SBLC / BG. Banks may, therefore, lay down an appropriate risk management and lending policy in this regard. Banks should comply with the recommendations of the Ghosh Committee and other internal requirements relating to acceptance of guarantees of other banks to obviate the possibility of frauds in this area. 8. Please acknowledge receipt. Yours faithfully, (Prashant Saran) Chief General Manager List of nominated banks (As on August 31, 2005) 1. Allahabad Bank
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/155 · issued 05 Sep 2005. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2499&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗