HomeCirculars › RBI/2005-06/196

RBI advises banks to consider hallmarked gold jewellery for advances

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 22 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 02 Nov 2005  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 21 Jun 2026, 07:50 IST
⏱ ~1 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI advises banks to consider hallmarked gold jewellery as safer collateral for advances, encouraging lower margins and flexible rates. This aims to boost hallmarking adoption, benefiting lenders, consumers, and the industry. Existing loan conditions remain unchanged.

What changed

RBI issued a circular on November 2, 2005, urging banks to recognize the advantages of hallmarked gold jewellery when granting advances. It suggests banks may offer preferential margins and interest rates for such collateral. No other conditions for gold loans were altered.

What it means for you

Banks can now treat hallmarked jewellery as more reliable collateral, potentially reducing risk and allowing more competitive loan terms. This could increase demand for hallmarking, improving quality assurance in the gold market. Lenders should update internal policies to reflect this preference without changing existing gold loan frameworks.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs)

Does this circular mandate lower margins for hallmarked jewellery?

No, it only advises banks to consider the advantages of hallmarked jewellery and decide on margins and rates accordingly. It is a recommendation, not a mandate.

Are non-hallmarked jewellery loans still allowed?

Yes, the circular does not prohibit loans against non-hallmarked jewellery. It simply encourages preferential treatment for hallmarked items.

Does this replace earlier gold loan guidelines?

No, it references the earlier circular from November 22, 1994, and states other conditions remain unchanged.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 21 Jun 2026, 07:50 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2553&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.