RBI Hikes General Provisioning for Standard Advances to 0.40% (RRBs)
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/201 · issued 08 Nov 2005 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI raised general provisioning on standard advances from 0.25% to 0.40% of funded outstanding, per circular dated November 8, 2005, following Mid-Term Review announcement of October 25, 2005. Direct agri and SME loans stay at 0.25%. This cushions banks against pro-cyclical credit risk during expansion.
What changed
The uniform provisioning requirement for standard assets was increased from 0.25% to 0.40% of funded outstanding on a portfolio basis. Direct advances to agriculture and SME sectors remain exempted at the old 0.25% rate.
What it means for you
Banks must now set aside more capital for performing loans, reducing net interest margins slightly but building a buffer against future downturns. This counter-cyclical measure addresses the tendency to underestimate risk during credit booms. Lenders with high standard asset growth will feel the impact most.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Recalculate provisioning for all standard advances at 0.40%, excluding direct agri and SME loans.
Update internal prudential guidelines and reporting systems to reflect the new provisioning rate.
Communicate the change to credit and risk teams to adjust loan pricing or capital planning.
Acknowledge receipt of this circular to the respective RBI Regional Office (as directed to RRBs).
Who it affects
All Regional Rural Banks (primary addressees), Commercial banks (implied by policy scope but not directly addressed in this circular)
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-19 19:36 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn05 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
Which loans are exempt from the higher 0.40% provisioning?
Direct advances to agriculture and SME sectors continue to attract the old 0.25% provisioning rate.
Why did RBI increase the provisioning requirement?
To address pro-cyclicality in lending—during credit booms, risk is often underestimated. Higher provisioning builds a cushion for when the economy slows or credit weaknesses emerge.
Does this apply to all standard assets or only new loans?
It applies to the entire funded outstanding of standard assets on a portfolio basis, not just new loans.
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2744: RPCD.CO.RRB.No.BC.46/03.05.34/2005-06 — "Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06 : Additional Provisioning Requirement for Standard As”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2005-06/201
RPCD CO.RRB.No.BC.46/03.05.34/2005-06
November 8, 2005
All Regional Rural Banks
Dear Sir,
Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06: Additional Provisioning Requirement for Standard Assets
In terms of the extant prudential guidelines, the standard assets attract a uniform provisioning requirement of 0.25 per cent of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis. Traditionally, banks’ loans and advances portfolio is pro-cyclical and tends to grow faster during an expansionary phase and grows slowly during a recessionary phase. During times of expansion and accelerated credit growth, there is a tendency to underestimate the level of inherent risk and the converse holds good during times of recession. This tendency is not effectively addressed by the above mentioned prudential specific provisioning requirements since they capture risk ex post but not ex ante . It is therefore necessary to build up provisioning to cushion banks' balance sheets in the event of a downturn in the economy or credit weaknesses surfacing later.
2. In this connection, a reference is invited to paragraph 85 of the Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06 announced by Governor on October 25, 2005 ( relevant extract enclosed ). Accordingly, taking into account the recent trends in credit growth, it has been decided to increase the general provisioning requirement for ‘standard advances’ from the present level of 0.25 per cent to 0.40 per cent. Consequently, the standard assets with the exception of banks’ direct advances to agricultural and SME sectors would attract a uniform provisioning requirement of 0.40 per cent of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis.
3. Banks would continue to make provision at 0.25 per cent for direct advances to agricultural and SME sectors in the standard category.
4. Please acknowledge receipt to our respective Regional Office.
Yours faithfully,
(G. Srinivasan)
Chief General Manager
Extract of Mid-Term Review of Annual Policy Statement for the year 2005-06
Prudential Provisioning Requirements: Review
82. In terms of the prudential guidelines, banks are required to assess their entire loans and advances portfolio on an account-by-account basis with regard to the degree of delinquency and classify them into four broad asset classification categories, viz ., standard, sub-standard, doubtful and loss. The standard assets attract a uniform provisioning requirement of 0.25 per cent of the funded outstanding on a portfolio basis. Banks are required to make specific provisions in respect of sub-standard assets at a uniform rate of 10 per cent of the funded outstanding and for doubtful accounts at rates ranging from 20 to 100 per cent, taking into account the period for which the account has remained non-performing and the realisable value of security charged to the bank.
83. Traditionally, banks’ loans and advances portfolio is pro-cyclical and tends to grow faster during an expansionary phase and grows slowly during a recessionary phase. During times of expansion and accelerated credit growth, there is a tendency to underestimate the level of inherent risk and the converse holds good during times of recession. This tendency is not effectively addressed by the above mentioned prudential specific provisioning requirements since they capture risk ex post but not ex ante .
84. The various options available for reducing the element of pro-cyclicality include, among others, adoption of objective methodologies for dynamic provisioning requirements, as is being done by a few countries, by estimating the requirements over a business cycle rather than a year on the basis of the riskiness of the assets, establishment of a linkage between the prudential capital requirements and through-the-cycle ratings instead of point-in-time ratings and establishment of a flexible loan-to-value (LTV) ratio requirements where the LTV ratio would be directly related to the movement of asset values.
85. Taking into account the recent trends in credit growth, it is proposed:
• to increase the general provisioning requirement for ‘standard advances’ from the present level of 0.25 per cent to 0.40 per cent. Banks’ direct advances to agricultural and SME sectors would be exempted from the additional provisioning requirement. As hitherto, these provisions would be eligible for inclusion in Tier II capital for capital adequacy purposes up to the permitted extent. Operational guidelines in this regard would be issued separately.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/201 · issued 08 Nov 2005. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2614&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.