HomeCirculars › RBI/2005-06/332

LC Bill Discounting: Risk Weight Shift to Issuing Bank

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/332 · issued 24 Mar 2006 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI circular dated March 24, 2006 treats clean (non-reserve) LC bill discounting as exposure on the LC issuing bank, not the borrower. This lowers risk weight to inter-bank norms, freeing capital for the discounting bank.

What changed

Earlier, all bills discounted under LC were treated as exposure on the borrower, attracting a 100% risk weight. Now, clean negotiations (not 'under reserve') are treated as exposure on the LC issuing bank, with inter-bank risk weight. Negotiations 'under reserve' remain borrower-exposure.

What it means for you

Banks discounting clean LC bills can now assign lower capital charge (inter-bank risk weight) instead of 100% on borrower. This improves capital efficiency for such transactions. However, 'under reserve' negotiations still require full borrower risk weight, so banks must carefully classify each negotiation.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

Scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs/LABs), Trade finance departments, Risk management teams, Capital adequacy planners

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is a 'clean negotiation' under LC?

A clean negotiation is when the bank pays the beneficiary without any reservation or recourse, meaning it does not hold the beneficiary liable if the LC issuing bank fails to pay.

Does this circular change exposure norms for all LC transactions?

No, only clean negotiations are affected. Negotiations 'under reserve' still count as exposure on the borrower with 100% risk weight.

When did this circular take effect?

It came into immediate effect from March 24, 2006.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2690: DBOD.BP.BC.73/21.03.054/2005-06 — "Bills Discounted under LC - Risk Weight and Exposure Norms" dated March 24, 2006”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2005-06/332 DBOD.BP.BC. 73/21.03.054/2005-06 March 24, 2006 All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs / LABs) Dear Sir, Bills discounted under LC – Risk Weight and Exposure Norms Please refer to our circular DBOD.Dir.BC.62/13.07.09/2002-2003 dated January 24, 2003 . In terms of para 2(iv) of the circular, the credit exposure on account of bills purchased / discounted / negotiated under LCs or otherwise should be reckoned on the bank’s borrower constituent. Accordingly, the exposure should attract a risk weight appropriate to the borrower constituent (viz. 100% for firms, individuals, corporate, etc.) for capital adequacy purposes. 2. The above instructions have been reviewed and it has now been decided that : i. Bills purchased / discounted / negotiated under LC (where the payment to the beneficiary is not made ‘under reserve’) will be treated as an exposure on the LC issuing bank and not on the borrower. ii. All clean negotiations as indicated above in para (i) above, will be assigned the risk weight as is normally applicable to inter-bank exposures, for capital adequacy purposes. iii. In the case of negotiations ‘under reserve’ the exposure should be treated as on the borrower and risk weight assigned accordingly. 3. The above guidelines will come into operation with immediate effect. Yours faithfully, (Prashant Saran) Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/332 · issued 24 Mar 2006. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2796&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗