HomeCirculars › RBI/2006-07/287

RBI Clarifies Extraordinary Circumstances for Floating Provisions Use

Withdrawn / supersededStatus reviewed by Vikram Jain. Verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 13 Mar 2007  ·  Withdrawn: w.e.f. 04 Dec 2025  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 21 Jun 2026, 05:35 IST
⏱ ~1 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI clarifies that floating provisions can only be used for specific provisions in extraordinary, non-recurring losses—not normal business risks. Banks need board-approved policies and prior RBI permission for such use.

What changed

RBI clarified the definition of 'extra-ordinary circumstances' under which banks can use floating provisions for specific provisions. These circumstances are now categorized into General (e.g., civil unrest, natural calamities, pandemics), Market (e.g., systemic market meltdown), and Credit (only exceptional credit losses). Banks must have board-approved policies aligned with these parameters.

What it means for you

Banks cannot dip into floating provisions for routine credit losses or standard business fluctuations. This ensures floating provisions remain a buffer for truly rare, systemic shocks. Lenders must tighten internal policies to distinguish between ordinary and extraordinary losses, and seek RBI approval before using these provisions.

What you must do

Who it affects

All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), Bank boards and risk management committees, Credit and provisioning teams

Can we use floating provisions for a spike in NPAs due to a sector downturn?

No, unless the downturn qualifies as an extraordinary, non-recurring event like a systemic market meltdown. Routine sectoral stress is not covered.

Do we need RBI approval every time we want to use floating provisions?

Yes, prior permission from RBI is mandatory, along with board approval, even if the loss falls under the defined extraordinary categories.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 21 Jun 2026, 05:35 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3334&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.