No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2006-2007/230 · issued 09 Jan 2007 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates UCBs to adopt a Board-approved policy for property valuation, use independent valuers, and obtain two valuation reports for properties valued at ₹50 crore or more. Revaluation reserves must reflect true market appreciation, and empanelment procedures must be formalized.
What changed
RBI observed inconsistent practices among UCBs in property valuation and valuer appointment. This circular introduces standardized requirements: a Board-approved valuation policy, mandatory use of independent valuers, dual valuation for high-value properties (₹50 crore+), and formal empanelment procedures. It also clarifies revaluation reserve treatment for capital adequacy.
What it means for you
UCBs must tighten their property valuation processes to ensure accurate capital adequacy measurement. The 55% discount on revaluation reserves for Tier II capital remains, but banks must now prove reserves reflect true market value. This reduces risk of inflated collateral values and strengthens balance sheet transparency. Lenders need to update internal policies and maintain approved valuer registers.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Formulate a Board-approved policy for property valuation, covering collaterals and own assets.
Ensure all valuations are done by independent, professionally qualified valuers with no conflict of interest.
Obtain two independent valuation reports for any property valued at ₹50 crore or more.
Create and maintain a register of empanelled valuers with minimum qualifications per asset class.
Review revaluation frequency based on price volatility and align depreciation methods with expected benefit consumption.
Who it affects
All Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (UCBs), Bank boards and risk management committees, Credit and collateral valuation teams, External valuers and empanelment agencies
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-19 18:15 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn05 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
What is the minimum number of valuation reports needed for high-value properties?
For properties valued at ₹50 crore or above, banks must obtain at least two independent valuation reports.
Can revaluation reserves be fully counted as Tier II capital?
No, only 55% of revaluation reserves can be included in Tier II capital, and only if the reserves represent true market appreciation as per the bank's comprehensive revaluation policy.
What qualifications should valuers have?
Banks should prescribe minimum qualifications for valuers, which may vary by asset class (e.g., land, plant). These should consider qualifications under Section 34AB (Rule 8A) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2531: UBD.PCB.Cir.No.26/13.05.000/06-07 — "Valuation of Properties - Empanelment of Valuers - UCBs" dated January 9, 2007”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2006-2007/230
UBD. PCB. Cir.No.26/13.05.000/06-07
January 9, 2007.
The Chief Executive Officer of
All Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks
Dear Sir/Madam,
Valuation of Properties-Empanelment of Valuers -UCBs
It has been observed that different banks follow different policies for valuation of properties and appointment of valuers for the purpose. The issue of correct and realistic valuation of fixed assets owned by banks and that accepted by them as collateral for a sizable portion of their advances portfolio assumes significance in view of its implications for correct measurement of capital adequacy position of banks. In this context, there is a need for putting in place a system/procedure for realistic valuation of fixed assets and also for empanelment of valuers for the purpose.
2. Banks may be guided by the following aspects while formulating a policy on valuation of properties and appointment of valuers:
(a) Policy for valuation of properties
i) Banks should have a Board approved policy in place for valuation of properties including collaterals accepted for their exposures.
ii) The valuation should be done by professionally qualified independent valuers i.e. the valuer should not have a direct or indirect interest.
iii) The banks should obtain minimum two Independent Valuation Reports for properties valued at Rs.50 crore or above.
(b) Revaluation of bank’s own properties
In addition to the above, the banks may keep the following aspects in view while formulating policy for revaluation of their own properties.
i) The extant guidelines on Capital Adequacy permit banks to include revaluation reserves at a discount of 55% as a part of Tier II Capital. In view of this, it is necessary that revaluation reserves represent true appreciation in the market value of the properties and banks have in place a comprehensive policy for revaluation of fixed assets owned by them. Such a policy should inter alia cover procedure for identification of assets for revaluation, maintenance of separate set of records for such assets, the frequency of revaluation, depreciation policy for such assets, policy for sale of such revalued assets etc.The policy should also cover the disclosure required to be made in the 'Notes on Account' regarding the details of revaluation such as the original cost of the fixed assets subject to revaluation and accounting treatment for appreciation / depreciation etc.
ii) As the revaluation should reflect the change in the fair value of the fixed asset, the frequency of revaluation should be determined based on the observed volatility in the prices of the assets in the past. Further, any change in the method of depreciation should reflect the change in the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits of the assets. The banks should adhere to these principles meticulously while changing the frequency of revaluation/method of depreciation for a particular class of asset and should make proper disclosures in this regard.
(c) Policy for Empanelment of Independent valuers
i) Banks should have a procedure for empanelment of professional valuers and maintain a register of 'approved list of valuers'.
ii) Banks may prescribe a minimum qualification for empanelment of valuers. Different qualifications may be prescribed for different classes of assets (e.g. land and building, plant and machinery, agricultural land, etc.). While prescribing the qualification, banks may take into consideration the qualifications prescribed under Section 34AB (Rule 8A) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
3. Banks may also be guided by the relevant Accounting Standard issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
4. Please acknowledge receipt to the Regional Office concerned of Reserve Bank of India.
Yours faithfully,
(N.S.Vishwanathan)
Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2006-2007/230 · issued 09 Jan 2007. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3242&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.