HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-08/196

RBI Bans Lock-In Deposit Schemes at RRBs

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-08/196 · issued 29 Nov 2007 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has directed RRBs to immediately stop special deposit schemes with lock-in periods of 6-12 months that restrict premature withdrawals and pay no interest during lock-in, citing non-compliance with existing interest rate and deposit directives.

What changed

RBI observed that some RRBs were offering special term deposits with lock-in periods of 6 to 12 months, where premature withdrawal was not allowed or paid no interest, and interest rates differed from normal deposits. The RBI clarified these schemes violate its earlier directives on deposit interest rates, premature withdrawal rules, and non-discrimination among deposits of same maturity and date. RRBs must discontinue such schemes immediately and report compliance to their regional RBI office.

What it means for you

RRBs can no longer offer deposit products that lock in customer funds for 6-12 months with penal or zero interest on early withdrawal, as these are now deemed non-compliant. Banks must ensure all deposit schemes adhere strictly to RBI's interest rate directives, including equal treatment of deposits of same size and maturity. Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), RRB customers holding special lock-in deposit schemes, RRB board members and compliance teams

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What exactly is a lock-in period in these deposit schemes?

It is a period of 6 to 12 months during which the depositor cannot withdraw the deposit prematurely. If they do, no interest is paid for the period the deposit was held.

Why did RBI ban these schemes?

Because they violate earlier RBI directives that require equal interest rates for deposits of same maturity and date, and set rules for premature withdrawal. The schemes also offered interest rates not aligned with normal deposits.

What should RRBs do if they have already sold such schemes?

They must discontinue the schemes immediately and report compliance to their RBI Regional Office. Existing deposits may need to be handled as per RBI's further instructions or general deposit rules.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2309: RPCD.CO.RRB.No.BC.39/03.05.33/2007-08 — "Deposit Schemes with Lock-in Period" dated November 29, 2007”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2007-08/196 RPCD.CO. RRB.No.BC.39/03.05.33 /2007-08 November 29, 2007  The Chairmen All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) Dear Sir, Deposit schemes with lock-in period It has been brought to our notice that some banks are offering special term deposit products to customers, in addition to regular term deposits, ranging from 300 days to five years, with the following features: i. Lock-in periods ranging from 6 to 12 months; ii. During the lock-in period, premature withdrawal is not permitted. In case of premature withdrawal during the lock-in period, no interest is paid; iii. Rates of interest offered on these deposits are not in tune with the rates of interest on normal deposits; and iv. Part pre-payment is allowed by some banks, subject to certain conditions 2. In this connection, a reference is invited to DBOD directive DBOD No. Dir.BC.94/13.01.11/97 dated August 26, 1997, in terms of which RRBs have been advised that before launching new domestic deposit mobilisation schemes with the approval of their respective Boards, they should ensure that the provisions of Reserve Bank's directives on interest rates on deposits, premature withdrawal of term deposits, sanction of loans/advances against term deposits, etc., issued from time to time, are strictly adhered to. Any violation in this regard will be viewed seriously and may attract penalty under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Further, in terms of DBOD directives DBOD.No. Dir. BC.46 /13.03.00 /2000-01 dated November 4, 2000 and DBOD.No. Dir. BC.107/13.03.00/2000-01 dated April 19, 2001, no bank should discriminate in the matter of interest paid on deposits, between one deposit and another, accepted on the same date and for the same maturity, whether such deposits are accepted at the same office or at different offices of the bank, except in respect of fixed deposit schemes specifically for senior citizens offering higher and fixed rates of interest as compared to normal deposits of any size, and single term deposits of Rs.15 lakh and above on which varying rates of interest may be permitted on the basis of size of the deposits. 3.  It is clarified that the special schemes, with lock-in periods and other features referred to at paragraph 1 above, which have been floated by some banks, are not in conformity with our instructions.  Banks that have floated such deposit schemes are, therefore, advised to discontinue the schemes with immediate effect and report compliance to our Regional Office concerned. Yours faithfully, (C.S.Murthy) Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-08/196 · issued 29 Nov 2007. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3958&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗