HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-08/324

Avoid Duplicate Filing of Savings Bond Data with Income Tax Department

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 22 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 16 May 2008  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 21 Jun 2026, 00:53 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs agency banks to avoid duplicating Savings Bond investor data (Rs 5 lakh+) by submitting Form 61A only to the Public Debt Office, not directly to the Income Tax Department, to prevent redundant queries.

What changed

RBI observed that some agency banks, apart from submitting Form 61A to the Public Debt Office, also included the same data in the Annual Information Return (AIR) filed directly with the Director General of Income Tax (Systems). This circular advises banks to ensure no duplication of data filed with the Income Tax Department.

What it means for you

Banks must now strictly segregate their reporting channels: Savings Bond investor data above Rs 5 lakh goes only to the PDO, not to the IT Department. Duplicate filings cause unnecessary confirmation queries from tax authorities, increasing compliance burden. This directive tightens data submission discipline and reduces operational friction.

What you must do

Who it affects

Agency banks handling Savings Bonds (State Bank of India, Associate Banks, 17 Nationalised Banks, AXIS Bank, ICICI Bank Ltd, HDFC Bank Ltd, IDBI Bank, Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd), Public Debt Offices of RBI, Director General of Income Tax (Systems)

What is the threshold for reporting Savings Bond investor data?

Investments of Rs 5 lakh and more in a financial year must be reported in Form 61A.

Why was duplication happening?

Some banks were submitting Form 61A to the PDO and also including the same data in the Annual Information Return (AIR) filed directly with the Income Tax Department, causing duplicate records.

What happens if we continue duplicate filing?

The Income Tax Department may raise unnecessary confirmation queries, increasing compliance burden. RBI expects strict adherence to avoid such duplication.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 21 Jun 2026, 00:53 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=4185&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.