HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-2008/167

RBI cracks down on deposit schemes with lock-in periods

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-2008/167 · issued 25 Oct 2007 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has directed banks to immediately discontinue special term deposit schemes that impose lock-in periods of 6-12 months, deny interest on premature withdrawal during lock-in, or offer rates inconsistent with normal deposits. Such schemes violate existing RBI directives.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A payments & clearing officer in Indore notices their bank still offers a 'Festival Saver' deposit with a 6-month lock-in where no interest is paid if withdrawn early. She immediately flags it to her product team, who discontinue the scheme and report compliance to RBI, ensuring all new deposits follow the rules on equal interest and early withdrawal.

What changed

RBI observed that some banks launched special term deposit products with lock-in periods (6-12 months) where premature withdrawal was either barred or earned no interest, and interest rates differed from normal deposits. The RBI clarified these schemes are not in conformity with its instructions and must be discontinued immediately.

What it means for you

Banks can no longer offer deposit products that lock in customers for a fixed period without allowing premature withdrawal or paying interest during that period. This ensures uniformity in deposit terms and prevents discrimination among depositors. Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Bank treasury and product teams, Retail deposit customers

❓ Common questions

What exactly is a lock-in period in a deposit scheme?

A lock-in period is a fixed duration (e.g., 6-12 months) during which the depositor cannot withdraw the deposit prematurely. If withdrawal is attempted, no interest is paid.

Why did RBI ban these schemes?

These schemes violated RBI's existing directives on interest rates and premature withdrawal, and discriminated between deposits of the same maturity and date. RBI views such violations seriously.

What should banks do if they have already sold such deposits?

Banks must discontinue the schemes immediately and report compliance to RBI. Existing deposits may need to be handled as per RBI's further instructions, but the circular does not specify retroactive changes.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2007-2008/167 DBOD.No.Dir.BC. 39/13.03.00/2007-2008 October 25, 2007 All  Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir Deposit schemes with lock-in period It has been brought to our notice that some banks are offering special term deposit products to customers, in addition to regular term deposits, ranging from 300 days to five years, with the following features: i. Lock-in periods ranging from 6 to 12 months; ii. During the lock-in period, premature withdrawal is not permitted. In case of premature withdrawal during the lock-in period, no interest is paid; iii. Rates of interest offered on these deposits are not in tune with the rates of interest on normal deposits; iv. Part pre-payment is allowed by some banks, subject to certain conditions. 2.   In this connection, a reference is invited to paragraph 2.23 of our Master Circular on DBOD. No.Dir.BC. 7/13.03.00/2007-08 dated July 2, 2007 on    'Interest Rates on Rupee Deposits held in Domestic Deposits, etc.', in terms of which banks have been advised that before launching new domestic deposit mobilisation schemes with the approval of their respective Boards, they should ensure that the provisions of RBI directives on interest rates on deposits, premature withdrawal of term deposits, sanction of loans/advances against term deposits, etc., issued from time to time, are strictly adhered to. Any violation in this regard will be viewed seriously and may attract penalty under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Further, in terms of paragraph 2.27(c) of the above circular , no bank should discriminate in the matter of interest paid on deposits, between one deposit and another, accepted on the same date and for the same maturity, whether such deposits are accepted at the same office or at different offices of the bank, except in respect of fixed deposit schemes specifically for resident Indian senior citizens offering higher and fixed rates of interest as compared to normal deposits of any size, and single term deposits of Rs.15 lakh and above on which varying rates of interest may be permitted on the basis of size of the deposits. 3.  It is clarified that the special schemes, with lock-in periods and other features referred to at paragraph 1 above, which have been floated by some banks, are not in conformity with our instructions.  Banks that have floated such deposit schemes are, therefore, advised to discontinue the schemes with immediate effect and report compliance. Yours faithfully ( P.Vijaya Bhaskar ) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-2008/167 · issued 25 Oct 2007. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Bank treasury and product teams, Retail deposit customers), your first concrete step on “RBI cracks down on deposit schemes with lock-in periods” is: “Identify any special term deposit schemes with lock-in periods (6-12 months) and discontinue them immediately.” (RBI issued this 25 Oct 2007).

  1. Circular: RBI/2007-2008/167 -- RBI cracks down on deposit schemes with lock-in periods
  2. Issued: 25 Oct 2007
  3. Action required: Identify any special term deposit schemes with lock-in periods (6-12 months) and discontinue them immediately.
  4. Action required: Ensure all new deposit schemes comply with RBI directives on interest rates, premature withdrawal, and non-discrimination among deposits of same maturity and date.
  5. Action required: Report compliance to RBI as advised in the circular.
  6. Action required: Review Board-approved deposit schemes to confirm they adhere to Master Circular instructions.
  7. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  8. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  9. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3898&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗