HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-2008/167

RBI cracks down on deposit schemes with lock-in periods

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 22 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 25 Oct 2007  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 21 Jun 2026, 02:10 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI has directed banks to immediately discontinue special term deposit schemes that impose lock-in periods of 6-12 months, deny interest on premature withdrawal during lock-in, or offer rates inconsistent with normal deposits. Such schemes violate existing RBI directives.

What changed

RBI observed that some banks launched special term deposit products with lock-in periods (6-12 months) where premature withdrawal was either barred or earned no interest, and interest rates differed from normal deposits. The RBI clarified these schemes are not in conformity with its instructions and must be discontinued immediately.

What it means for you

Banks can no longer offer deposit products that lock in customers for a fixed period without allowing premature withdrawal or paying interest during that period. This ensures uniformity in deposit terms and prevents discrimination among depositors. Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Bank treasury and product teams, Retail deposit customers

What exactly is a lock-in period in a deposit scheme?

A lock-in period is a fixed duration (e.g., 6-12 months) during which the depositor cannot withdraw the deposit prematurely. If withdrawal is attempted, no interest is paid.

Why did RBI ban these schemes?

These schemes violated RBI's existing directives on interest rates and premature withdrawal, and discriminated between deposits of the same maturity and date. RBI views such violations seriously.

What should banks do if they have already sold such deposits?

Banks must discontinue the schemes immediately and report compliance to RBI. Existing deposits may need to be handled as per RBI's further instructions, but the circular does not specify retroactive changes.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 21 Jun 2026, 02:10 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3898&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.