HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-2008/179

RBI Cautions Banks on Promoter Equity Funding Risk in Project Finance

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-2008/179 · issued 06 Nov 2007 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI warns banks that allowing promoters to bring equity proportionately with debt disbursement carries higher equity-funding risk. Banks must set a clear Debt-Equity Ratio policy and ensure promoters maintain stipulated DER at all times to avoid banks indirectly funding equity.

What changed

RBI observed that the practice where promoters agree upfront to bring equity proportionately as banks disburse debt poses greater equity-funding risk. The circular advises banks to adopt a clear policy on Debt-Equity Ratio and ensure promoters' equity infusion maintains the stipulated DER at all times, and to structure funding sequences to prevent banks from effectively funding equity.

What it means for you

Banks must tighten project finance underwriting to avoid indirectly bearing promoter equity risk. Lenders need to enforce stricter equity infusion schedules and monitor DER continuously. This reduces the risk of project defaults due to insufficient promoter skin in the game.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All commercial banks (excluding RRBs) engaged in project finance, Credit risk and project finance teams, Loan syndication and monitoring departments

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is the main risk RBI is highlighting in this circular?

RBI flags that when promoters agree to bring equity proportionately as banks disburse debt, there is greater equity-funding risk—meaning the bank may end up funding the promoter's equity share if the promoter fails to bring in funds on time.

What should banks do to comply with this advisory?

Banks must have a clear board-approved policy on Debt-Equity Ratio, ensure promoters infuse equity to maintain stipulated DER at all times, and structure funding sequences to avoid banks indirectly funding equity.

Does this circular apply to Regional Rural Banks?

No, the circular explicitly excludes RRBs. It applies to all other commercial banks.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2320: DBOD.BP.No.48/21.04.048/2007-08 — "Project Finance Portfolio of Banks" dated November 6, 2007”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2007-2008/179 DBOD.BP.No. 48/ 21.04.048 /2007-08 November 06, 2007 All Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir, Project Finance Portfolio of banks At the time of financing projects banks generally adopt one of the following methodologies as far as determining the level of promoters’ equity is concerned. 1) Promoters bring their entire contribution upfront before the bank starts disbursing its commitment. 2) Promoters bring certain percentage of their equity (40% – 50%) upfront and balance is brought in stages. 3) Promoters agree, ab initio, that they will bring in equity funds proportionately as the banks finance the debt portion. While it is appreciated that such decisions are to be taken by the boards of the respective banks, it has been observed that the last method has greater equity-funding risk. 2. To contain this risk, banks are advised in their own interest to have a clear policy regarding the Debt Equity Ratio (DER) and to ensure that the infusion of equity/fund by promoters should be such that the stipulated level of DER is maintained at all times. Further they may adopt funding sequences so that possibility of equity funding by banks is obviated. Yours faithfully [Prashant Saran] Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-2008/179 · issued 06 Nov 2007. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=3925&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗