HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/149

RBI raises limit for direct import bill remittances to USD 300,000

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 22 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 01 Sep 2008  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 23:08 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI has increased the threshold for AD Category-I banks to remit import payments directly to overseas suppliers from USD 100,000 to USD 300,000, easing documentation for smaller imports.

What changed

The previous limit of USD 100,000 for direct receipt of import bills/documents by importers has been raised to USD 300,000. This liberalization applies to AD Category-I banks making remittances for imports where documents are received directly from the overseas supplier.

What it means for you

Banks can now process higher-value import remittances without requiring documents to pass through the banking channel, reducing paperwork and turnaround time for importers. However, banks must still conduct due diligence, ensure KYC/AML compliance, and report suspicious transactions to FIU-IND. The change simplifies trade finance for smaller imports but does not alter conditions for status holder exporters or rough diamond imports.

What you must do

Who it affects

AD Category-I banks, Importers who receive import bills/documents directly from overseas suppliers, Trade finance departments of banks

Does this circular apply to all types of imports?

Yes, for imports where documents are received directly by the importer from the overseas supplier, subject to conditions like compliance with Foreign Trade Policy and bank due diligence. Separate instructions for status holder exporters and rough diamond imports remain unchanged.

What due diligence must banks perform before remitting under the new limit?

Banks must be satisfied about the bonafides of the transaction, the importer's financial standing and track record, ensure KYC/AML compliance, and confirm that direct receipt of documents is customary in that trade.

What if the bank suspects the transaction is not genuine?

The bank must file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) with FIU-IND and refrain from processing the remittance until further clarity.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 23:08 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=4441&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.