HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/428

RBI Revises Fair Value Diminution for Restructured Loans

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/428 · issued 09 Apr 2009 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI clarifies that principal cash flows must be included when computing fair value loss on restructured loans, rejecting industry pleas to exclude them. This ensures full recognition of economic impairment, impacting provisioning for banks.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A credit & lending officer in Indore is restructuring a ₹10 lakh loan for a jeweler. She calculates the fair value loss by discounting both the principal and interest cash flows using the current BPLR plus risk premiums, then debits the full loss to the Profit & Loss Account that day, ensuring the bank's books show the true economic hit.

What changed

RBI reaffirmed that principal cash flows are part of the fair value diminution calculation for restructured advances, countering representations to exclude them. The circular also dismissed concerns that the existing methodology over-provisions due to general interest rate rises, stating the approach aligns with IAS 39 and AS 30.

What it means for you

Banks must continue to measure and provision for the full erosion in fair value of restructured loans, including principal cash flows. This prevents under-provisioning and ensures balance sheets reflect true economic loss, though it may strain margins during downturns.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), Bank credit and risk management teams, Loan restructuring departments

❓ Common questions

Why does RBI insist on including principal cash flows in fair value computation?

Excluding principal cash flows would understate the economic loss from restructuring, as elongation of repayment periods reduces the present value of the loan. This aligns with international accounting standards.

Does the new circular change the provisioning formula from 2008?

No, it reaffirms the existing formula from the August 2008 circular, rejecting industry suggestions to modify it. The discount rate remains BPLR plus term and credit risk premiums.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
6.1 In this context, it may be mentioned that prior to revision of the guidelines on restructuring of advances under CDR Mechanism issued vide circular dated November 10, 2005, the methodologies prescribed by the RBI for the computation of sacrifice by the  banks and FIs  differed.  Banks discounted   the future interest due as per the original loan agreement to the present value at a rate appropriate to the risk category of the borrower (i.e. current PLR plus the appropriate credit risk premium for the borrower category) and compared with the present value of the dues expected to be received under the restructuring package discounted on the same basis.  FIs, however, reckoned the future interest due, based on the PLR or its equivalent (rate charged to a AAA rated borrower immediately preceding the date of restructuring, if such rate was different from the announced PLR) as on the date of restructuring plus the original risk factor (risk factor applicable to the borrower at the time of initial sanction of the loan).  During the course of the discussions which the members of the Working Group to review the CDR Mechanism had with representatives of banks as part of their work,  it was represented that  methodology for computation of sacrifice(diminution) for banks should be aligned with that for FIs in order to ensure a level playing field and also in view of the fact that the difference in the present value of the interest cash flows as per the terms of pre-restructured loan and the post-restructured loan was substantial because the interest rates had declined during the last 4 to 5 years at that time.  The Working Group agreed to the suggestion, in principle, with the understanding that so long as the approach was followed consistently from year to year over the entire interest rate cycle, it would not raise any prudential issues.  Accordingly, the Group recommended to compute the diminution in the present value of the interest cash flows with reference to the “current BPLR as on the date of restructuring plus the appropriate term premium and credit risk premium for the borrower category on the date of restructuring” which was much lower than the interest rate charged on the pre-restructured loan at that time.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/428 · issued 09 Apr 2009. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), Bank credit and risk management teams, Loan restructuring departments), your first concrete step on “RBI Revises Fair Value Diminution for Restructured Loans” is: “Ensure restructuring packages include computation of fair value diminution using both principal and interest cash flows.” (RBI issued this 09 Apr 2009).

  1. Circular: RBI/2008-09/428 -- RBI Revises Fair Value Diminution for Restructured Loans
  2. Issued: 09 Apr 2009
  3. Action required: Ensure restructuring packages include computation of fair value diminution using both principal and interest cash flows.
  4. Action required: Apply the discount rate as current BPLR plus term and credit risk premiums as specified.
  5. Action required: Debit the provision for diminution to the Profit & Loss Account immediately upon restructuring.
  6. Action required: Review existing restructured loan portfolios for compliance with this methodology.
  7. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  8. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  9. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=4920&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗