HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/429

RBI defers floating provision rule, encourages buffer building

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/429 · issued 09 Apr 2009 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has deferred a March 2009 rule that would have restricted floating provisions. For FY 2008-09 only, banks can choose to either net floating provisions from gross NPAs or count them as Tier II capital (up to 1.25% of RWA). This aligns with G20 calls to build buffers in good times.

What changed

RBI deferred implementation of paragraph (iv) of its March 25, 2009 circular to FY 2009-10. For FY 2008-09 only, banks now have a choice: either deduct existing floating provisions from gross NPAs to compute net NPAs, or continue to reckon them as Tier II capital subject to the 1.25% of RWA ceiling. Earlier, the March 25 circular had removed the netting option.

What it means for you

Banks get temporary flexibility to manage capital and NPA reporting for FY 2008-09. The deferral supports the G20's procyclicality mitigation agenda, encouraging banks to build floating provision buffers in good times for use during stress. RBI will issue detailed guidelines later in 2009 after FSB/BCBS recommendations.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Bank treasury and risk management teams, Bank finance and compliance departments

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What exactly was deferred?

Paragraph (iv) of the March 25, 2009 circular, which would have removed the option to net floating provisions from gross NPAs, was deferred to FY 2009-10. For FY 2008-09, banks retain the choice.

Can we still use floating provisions as Tier II capital?

Yes, if you choose not to net them from gross NPAs. They can be counted as Tier II capital, but total Tier II from floating provisions cannot exceed 1.25% of total risk-weighted assets.

Is this a permanent change?

No. The choice is only for FY 2008-09. RBI will issue detailed guidelines on procyclicality mitigation later in 2009, which will likely set new rules.

📜 This document’s life story (2 recorded events, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Partially modified by Floating Provisions: RBI Defers NPA Netting Rule Change
RBI’s words: “it has been decided to defer the implementation of paragraph (iv) of the circular dated March 25, 2009”
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1958: DBOD.No.BP.BC.122/21.04.048/2008-09 — "Prudential Treatment in respect of Floating Provisions" dated April 9, 2009”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
Prudential treatment in respect of Floating  Provisions Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.118 /21.04.048/2008-09 dated March 25, 2009 regarding prudential treatment of different types of provisions in respect of loan portfolios in terms of which banks have been advised that  Floating Provisions cannot be netted from gross NPAs to arrive at net NPAs, but could be reckoned as part of Tier II capital subject to the overall ceiling of 1.25% of total Risk Weighted Assets. 2. Banks are aware that the Leaders of Group of Twenty met in London on April 2, 2009 and declared the Global Plan for Recovery and Reform and declaration on strengthening the financial system. The Group agreed to  take several measures to strengthen international frameworks for prudential regulations and has asked that the Financial Stability Board (FSB), Basle Committee of on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and Committee on Global Financial System (CGFS), working with accounting standard setters, should take forward, with a deadline of end 2009, implementation of the recommendations to mitigate procyclicality, including a requirement for banks to build buffers of resources i.e capital and provisions in good times that they can draw down when conditions deteriorate. This position would modify instructions on use of floating provisions contained in our circular DBOD.BP.BC.89/21.04.048/2005-06 dated June 22, 2006. 3. While FSB, BCBS and CGFS will be working out detailed measures to mitigate procyclicality in due course and RBI would also continue to take measures to mitigate procyclicality, it is necessary that banks do realize the importance of building buffers such as floating provisions in good times so that they are able to use these in adverse circumstances. Therefore, banks are encouraged to build floating provisions as a buffer for the possible stress on asset quality later. Reserve Bank will issue detailed guidelines on mitigating procyclicality later this year after FSF, BCBS and CGFS finalize their recommendations in this regard. 4. It has been decided to defer the implementation of para (iv) of the circular dated March 25, 2009 ibid to the year 2009-10. Accordingly, banks will have the choice between either deducting their existing  floating provisions from Gross NPAs to arrive at net NPAs or reckoning it  as part of Tier II capital subject to the overall ceiling of 1.25% of total Risk Weighted Assets. It may be noted that this choice is limited to the financial year 2008-09 only.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/429 · issued 09 Apr 2009. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=4921&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗