HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/485

Capital Adequacy Norms for Bank Exposures to Central Counterparties

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 26 May 2009  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 20:13 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI assigns zero capital charge for bank exposures to CCPs from derivatives and securities financing, as daily collateralization covers credit risk. Margin deposits with CCIL get 20% risk weight; other CCPs follow rating-based weights. Review in one year.

What changed

RBI issued new capital adequacy norms for banks' exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) like CCIL and stock exchange clearing houses. Exposures from derivatives and securities financing transactions (e.g., CBLOs, repos) now get zero counterparty credit risk weight, assuming full daily collateralization. Margin deposits and collateral kept with CCPs attract risk weights: 20% for CCIL, and rating-based for others under the New Capital Adequacy Framework.

What it means for you

Banks can reduce capital held against CCP exposures from derivatives and securities financing, freeing up capital for other uses. However, margin deposits with CCIL require 20% risk weight, impacting capital allocation. The one-year review means banks must monitor CCP risk management and collateral quality closely.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), Banks using CCIL for clearing, Banks trading currency futures, interest rate futures, or other exchange-traded derivatives, Banks involved in securities financing transactions like CBLOs and repos

Why do CCP exposures get zero risk weight for derivatives?

RBI presumes CCPs fully collateralize exposures daily, eliminating counterparty credit risk, so no capital is needed for these trades.

What risk weight applies to margin deposits with CCIL?

Margin deposits with CCIL get a 20% risk weight. For other CCPs, risk weights depend on their credit ratings under the New Capital Adequacy Framework.

Will existing exposure limits change for exchange-traded transactions?

No, existing limits like gap limits for forex and PV01 limits for interest rate risk continue to apply to exchange-traded transactions as well.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 20:13 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5001&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.