HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/485

Capital Adequacy Norms for Bank Exposures to Central Counterparties

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/485 · issued 26 May 2009 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI assigns zero capital charge for bank exposures to CCPs from derivatives and securities financing, as daily collateralization covers credit risk. Margin deposits with CCIL get 20% risk weight; other CCPs follow rating-based weights. Review in one year.

What changed

RBI issued new capital adequacy norms for banks' exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) like CCIL and stock exchange clearing houses. Exposures from derivatives and securities financing transactions (e.g., CBLOs, repos) now get zero counterparty credit risk weight, assuming full daily collateralization. Margin deposits and collateral kept with CCPs attract risk weights: 20% for CCIL, and rating-based for others under the New Capital Adequacy Framework.

What it means for you

Banks can reduce capital held against CCP exposures from derivatives and securities financing, freeing up capital for other uses. However, margin deposits with CCIL require 20% risk weight, impacting capital allocation. The one-year review means banks must monitor CCP risk management and collateral quality closely.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), Banks using CCIL for clearing, Banks trading currency futures, interest rate futures, or other exchange-traded derivatives, Banks involved in securities financing transactions like CBLOs and repos

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Why do CCP exposures get zero risk weight for derivatives?

RBI presumes CCPs fully collateralize exposures daily, eliminating counterparty credit risk, so no capital is needed for these trades.

What risk weight applies to margin deposits with CCIL?

Margin deposits with CCIL get a 20% risk weight. For other CCPs, risk weights depend on their credit ratings under the New Capital Adequacy Framework.

Will existing exposure limits change for exchange-traded transactions?

No, existing limits like gap limits for forex and PV01 limits for interest rate risk continue to apply to exchange-traded transactions as well.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1934: DBOD.BP.BC.No.134/21.06.001/2008-09 — "Capital Adequacy Norms for Banks' Exposures to Central Counterparties (CCPs)" dated May 26, 2009”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2008-09/485 DBOD.BP.BC. No.134/21.06.001/2008-09 May 26, 2009 The Chairman and Managing Directors/ Chief Executive Officers All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs and LABs) Dear Sir, Capital Adequacy Norms for Banks’ Exposures to Central Counterparties(CCPs) Please refer to our Master Circular – Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline – Implementation of New Capital Adequacy Framework No. RBI/ 2008-09 /68.DBOD.No. BP.BC. 11 /21.06.001/2008-09 dated July 1, 2008. 2 . Banks have been exposed to CCPs attached to stock exchanges while settling contracts like currency futures and interest rate futures. The Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL) has also been acting as a Central Counter Party (CCP) for banks in various segments of the financial markets. In terms of para 5.15.3 (iv) (b) of the Master Circular, the instruments traded on futures and options exchanges which are subject to daily mark-to-market and margin payments are exempted from the capital requirements 3. As indicated in paragraph 146 ( extract reproduced in Annex ) of the Annual Policy Statement for the year 2009-10, released on April 21, 2009, the revised norms for capital adequacy treatment of banks’ various types of credit risk exposures to the CCPs will be as under: i) The exposures to CCPs on account of derivatives trading and securities financing transactions ( e.g. CBLOs, Repos) outstanding against them, will be assigned zero exposure value for counterparty credit risk, as it is presumed that the CCPs’ exposures to their counterparties are fully collateralised on a daily basis, thereby providing protection for the CCP’s credit risk exposures; ii) The deposits/collaterals kept by banks with the CCPs will attract risk weights appropriate to the nature of the CCP. In the case of CCIL, the risk weight will be 20 per cent and for other CCPs, it will be according to the ratings assigned to these entities as per the New Capital Adequacy Framework. 4 . The above prescriptions about the adequacy of margin, quality of collateral and risk management systems of the clearing house/CCP will be reviewed after one year. 5 . All existing exposure limits, such as gap limits for forex exposures, PV01 limits for interest rate risk exposures which are applicable for OTC derivatives exposures of banks will continue to apply for exchange traded transactions as well. Yours faithfully, (P.Vijaya Bhaskar) Chief General Manager Extract from Annual Policy for 2009-10 Annex I (g) Risk Weights for Exposure to Central Counterparties 145. A central counterparty (CCP) is an entity that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded within one or more financial markets, becoming the legal counterparty such that it is the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. The CCIL has been acting as a CCP for banks in various segments of the financial market. Similarly, contracts like interest rate futures and currency futures, which are traded on the stock exchanges, are also settled through the clearing houses attached to these exchanges. 146. Banks settling trades through CCIL/stock exchanges have two types of exposures to these CCPs. First, on account of the on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions undertaken through the CCP; and second, the exposure on account of deposits/collateral kept with the CCPs to meet the margin requirements. It has been decided to lay down the norms for capital adequacy treatment of such exposures. Accordingly: the exposures on account of derivatives/securities financing transactions trades outstanding against all the CCPs, will be assigned zero exposure value, as it is presumed that the CCPs’ exposures to their counterparties are fully collateralised on a daily basis, thereby providing protection for the central counterparty’s credit risk exposures; the margin amounts/collaterals maintained with the CCPs will attract risk weights appropriate to the nature of the CCP. For CCIL, the risk weight will be 20 per cent and for other CCPs, it will be according to the ratings assigned to these entities as per the New Capital Adequacy Framework. the above prescription will be subject to review on an on-going basis by the Reserve Bank about the adequacy of margin, quality of collateral and risk management systems of the clearing house/CCP.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/485 · issued 26 May 2009. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5001&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗