UCBs: Credit Delivery to Micro and Small Enterprises
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/501 · issued 16 Jun 2009 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI directs Primary Urban Cooperative Banks to implement Working Group recommendations for timely credit flow to MSEs, including loan and rehabilitation policies approved by the Board, and to apply existing debt restructuring guidelines to prevent sickness.
What changed
RBI issued a circular on June 16, 2009, directing UCBs to adopt recommendations from the Chakrabarty Working Group on MSE credit. Banks must review and put in place Board-approved loan and rehabilitation policies for the MSE sector. The circular emphasizes using existing debt restructuring guidelines to detect and address incipient sickness early.
What it means for you
UCBs must now formalize their MSE lending and revival frameworks with Board approval, ensuring proactive management of stressed accounts. This aligns with broader RBI efforts to improve credit flow to MSEs and reduce sickness. Banks should expect closer scrutiny of their adherence to restructuring guidelines and timely action on potentially viable sick units.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Review and get Board approval for a loan policy governing MSE credit facilities.
Formulate and get Board approval for a restructuring/rehabilitation policy for potentially viable sick MSE units.
Apply existing debt restructuring guidelines (circulars dated March 9, 2006, and March 6, 2009) optimally to prevent sickness.
Submit an Action Taken Report to the concerned RBI Regional Office by July 31, 2009.
Who it affects
Primary (Urban) Cooperative Banks, MSE borrowers, Board of Directors of UCBs
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-19 10:07 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn03 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
What is the key deadline for UCBs under this circular?
UCBs must submit an Action Taken Report to the concerned RBI Regional Office by July 31, 2009.
Does this circular introduce new restructuring guidelines for MSEs?
No, it directs banks to optimally apply existing debt restructuring guidelines (from 2006 and 2009) and to put in place Board-approved policies for loan and rehabilitation.
Which recommendations are UCBs specifically asked to implement?
UCBs must implement the recommendations set out in Annex III of the circular, focusing on timely and adequate flow of credit to the MSE sector.
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1920: UBD.BPD.No.71/09.09.001/2008-09 — "Credit Delivery to the Micro and Small Enterprises Sector" dated June 16, 2009”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2008-09/501
UBD.BPD.No. 71/09.09.001/2008-09
June 16, 2009
Chief Executive Officer
Primary (Urban) Cooperative Banks
Dear Sir / Madam,
Credit delivery to the Micro and Small Enterprises Sector
In recognition of the problems being faced by the Micro and Small Enterprises (MSE) sector, particularly with respect to rehabilitation of potentially viable sick units, the Reserve Bank had constituted a Working Group under the Chairmanship of Dr. K. C. Chakrabarty, Chairman & Managing Director, Punjab National Bank.
2. The aforesaid Group submitted its report to Reserve Bank of India in April 2008, covering comprehensively the entire gamut of issues and problems (credit and non-credit related) confronting the sector. The Reserve Bank placed the report on its website and invited comments from all stake holders. The responses and comments on the report have been carefully examined.
3. The recommendations made by the Group need to be considered by Government of India, State Governments and commercial banks ( Annexes I to III respectively). The recommendations relating to Government of India have been forwarded to them for consideration and necessary action. The recommendations relating to the State Governments have been forwarded to the SLBC Convenor banks for taking up the issue in the SLBC meetings. Other recommendations pertaining to SIDBI have been sent to them.
4. Several recommendations have been made regarding the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE) Scheme. These recommendations will be considered by the Standing Advisory Committee on Flow of Institutional Credit to MSEs, in terms of paragraph 114 of the Annual Policy for 2009-10 .
5. The Group has addressed problems being faced by the sector in getting adequate and timely credit. It has also made recommendations not only for timely detection and remedial action with respect to incipient sickness, but also rehabilitation of sick units which can be revived.
6. You are advised to consider, for speedy implementation, the recommendations made by the Working Group set out in Annex III with regard to timely and adequate flow of credit to the MSE sector.
7. The Reserve Bank has carefully considered the Group’s recommendations regarding rehabilitation of potentially viable sick MSE units/enterprises, which essentially aim at timely detection of sickness and adoption of remedial measures to rehabilitate the potentially viable ones. While fully appreciating the sense of the Group’s recommendations, attention of banks is invited to the guidelines issued on MSE debt restructuring in respect of borrowal accounts that show symptoms of stickiness, vide circulars:
i. UBD.BPD.Cir.No. 36/09.09.001/2005-06 dated March 9, 2006
ii. UBD.PCB.BPD.No. 53/13.05.000/2008-09 dated March 6, 2009
These guidelines, in fact, subsume the incipient sickness stage and, if implemented as intended, could significantly prevent or arrest sickness at the initial stages. Such MSE units/enterprises, which turn sick in spite of debt re-structuring are expected to be few and would fall within the ambit of the extant guidelines on rehabilitation of potentially viable sick units / enterprises (issued vide circular UBD. No. PCB. POT. 01 / 09.09.01 / 2002-03 dated July 19, 2002). Banks are, therefore, advised to apply the guidelines on debt restructuring optimally and in letter and spirit. This would be to their advantage as well as their MSE clients.
8. Accordingly, in the light of the recommendations of the Group and the Banking Codes Standards Board of India's Code of Commitment for the MSE borrowers, your bank may undertake a review and put in place the following policies for the MSE sector, duly approved by the Board of Directors:
i. Loan policy governing extension of credit facilities
ii. Restructuring / Rehabilitation policy for revival of potentially viable sick units / enterprises.
9. Please acknowledge receipt and forward an Action Taken Report to concerned Regional Office by July 31, 2009.
Yours faithfully,
(A.K. Khound)
Chief General Manager–in-Charge
Encl.: Annex - I to III
ANNEX-I
Sr. No.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/501 · issued 16 Jun 2009. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5039&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.