HomeCirculars › RBI/2008-09/508

Fraud Coordination Under Multiple Banking Arrangements

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/508 · issued 24 Jun 2009 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates banks to share fraud details immediately under multiple banking arrangements to prevent repeat frauds. Lenders must coordinate legal and recovery actions, with the detecting bank or largest exposure bank leading efforts.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A credit & lending officer in Indore discovers that a borrower used the same gold jewelry as security for loans at two different banks. She immediately emails the fraud details to the other bank's fraud team, and together they agree to file a joint police complaint and coordinate recovery efforts, led by her bank since it detected the fraud first.

What changed

RBI observed that borrowers defrauding one bank continued enjoying credit from other banks under multiple banking arrangements, sometimes using the same securities. The circular reinforces existing information-sharing rules from September 2008, now requiring multilateral exchange of fraud incidents, legal actions, and borrower activities post-fraud.

What it means for you

Banks must now proactively share fraud-related information across all lenders in a multiple banking setup to prevent borrowers from exploiting information gaps. This reduces the risk of undetected frauds and ensures coordinated recovery and legal action, potentially lowering credit losses.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Banks with multiple banking arrangement exposures, Credit risk and fraud monitoring teams

❓ Common questions

What triggers the need to share fraud details with other banks?

Detection of a fraud in a borrowal account under multiple banking arrangement triggers immediate sharing of details with all other financing banks to prevent the borrower from defrauding them.

Who should lead the coordinated action among banks?

The bank that detects the fraud first or the bank with the maximum exposure should drive the coordination for legal, criminal, and recovery actions.

Does this circular replace the September 2008 DBOD circular?

No, it reinforces and supplements it by mandating multilateral exchange of fraud-related information as part of ongoing compliance.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2008-09/508 DBS CO.FrMC BC No  8  /23.04.001/2008-09 June 24, 2009 The Chairman / Chief Executives of All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir, Frauds in borrowal accounts having multiple banking arrangements It has come to our notice that certain unscrupulous borrowers enjoying credit facilities under "multiple banking arrangement" have, after defrauding one of the financing banks, continued to enjoy the facilities with other financing banks and in some cases availed even higher limits at those banks. In certain cases the borrowers used the accounts maintained at other financing banks to siphon off funds fraudulently diverted from the bank on which the fraud was perpetrated. This could be possible due to lack of a formal arrangement for exchange of information among various lending banks. While the affected bank was engaged in recovery / criminal action at its end, the borrowers went about perpetrating fraud in their accounts with the other financing banks. In some of the fraud cases reported by banks, it was revealed at a later stage that the securities offered by the borrowers to different banks were the same. 2. In this connection, we invite your attention to circular DBOD No BP BC 46 / 08.12.001/2008-09 dated September 19, 2008 issued by our Department of Banking Operations and Development (DBOD) advising banks to strengthen the sharing of information about the status of borrowers enjoying credit facilities under multiple banking arrangement. The circular prescribes a system of obtaining declaration from borrowers, exchange of information among banks on regular intervals and obtaining regular certification by a professional regarding compliance of various statutory prescriptions. Therefore, as part of ongoing compliance with the instructions contained in the above circular, the banks which have financed a borrower under multiple banking arrangement are also required to exchange information on multilateral basis regarding incidents of fraud, legal actions taken and covert activities / operations of the borrower after the fraud, etc. 3. Therefore, it is imperative on the part of banks to have a consolidated view of frauds committed by a borrower on different banks so as to ascertain the quantum of frauds, loss caused by the frauds, perceived ramifications thereof etc. As such, all the banks which have financed a borrower under 'multiple banking' arrangement should take co-ordinated action, based on commonly agreed strategy, for legal / criminal actions, follow up for recovery, exchange of details on modus operandi, achieving consistency in data / information on frauds reported to Reserve Bank of India, etc. Preferably, the co-ordination efforts should be driven by the bank which detects the fraud first or by the bank which has the maximum exposure, depending on circumstances. It would therefore be necessary for the bank which detects a fraud to immediately share the details with all other banks in the multiple banking arrangement. 4. Please acknowledge receipt. Yours faithfully (P K Panda) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2008-09/508 · issued 24 Jun 2009. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Banks with multiple banking arrangement exposures, Credit risk and fraud monitoring teams), your first concrete step on “Fraud Coordination Under Multiple Banking Arrangements” is: “Immediately share fraud details with all other banks in the multiple banking arrangement upon detection.” (RBI issued this 24 Jun 2009).

  1. Circular: RBI/2008-09/508 -- Fraud Coordination Under Multiple Banking Arrangements
  2. Issued: 24 Jun 2009
  3. Action required: Immediately share fraud details with all other banks in the multiple banking arrangement upon detection.
  4. Action required: Establish a coordinated strategy for legal, criminal, and recovery actions, led by the detecting bank or the one with highest exposure.
  5. Action required: Exchange information on modus operandi, securities pledged, and borrower activities to ensure consistency in fraud reporting to RBI.
  6. Action required: Review and strengthen existing information-sharing mechanisms as per DBOD circular of September 2008.
  7. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  8. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  9. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5051&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗