Retail Issue of Subordinated Debt for Tier II Capital
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/287 · issued 13 Jan 2010 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates banks issuing subordinated debt to retail investors to include a specific investor sign-off acknowledging understanding of risks, avoid using fixed deposit rates as benchmarks for floating rate instruments, and clearly disclose in bold that the debt is not deposit insured.
What changed
RBI issued new conditions for banks issuing subordinated debt to retail investors for Tier II capital. Banks must now incorporate a specific investor sign-off in the application form confirming understanding of the instrument's features and risks. Floating rate instruments cannot use the bank's fixed deposit rate as a benchmark. All communications must state in bold font size 14 that subordinated bonds differ from fixed deposits and are not covered by deposit insurance.
What it means for you
Banks can now tap retail investors for Tier II capital but must ensure robust investor education and disclosure. The sign-off requirement protects banks from future disputes, while the ban on using FD rates as benchmarks prevents misleading comparisons. Clear disclaimers about lack of deposit insurance reduce regulatory risk and align with consumer protection norms.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Update application forms for retail subordinated debt to include the prescribed investor sign-off clause.
Ensure floating rate subordinated debt instruments do not reference the bank's fixed deposit rate as a benchmark.
Revise all publicity material, application forms, and communications to display in bold font size 14 that the instrument is not a fixed deposit and lacks deposit insurance.
Train sales and compliance teams on the new disclosure requirements before any retail issuance.
Who it affects
All commercial banks (excluding RRBs) issuing subordinated debt to retail investors, Retail investors in subordinated debt instruments, Bank compliance and legal departments
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-19 07:44 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn03 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
What is the purpose of the investor sign-off requirement?
The sign-off ensures that retail investors formally acknowledge they have understood the terms and risks of the subordinated debt instrument, as disclosed in the prospectus documents, enhancing investor education and reducing potential disputes.
Why can't floating rate subordinated debt use the bank's fixed deposit rate as a benchmark?
Using the fixed deposit rate as a benchmark could mislead investors into thinking the instrument is similar to a deposit, whereas subordinated debt carries higher risk and is not insured. RBI prohibits this to maintain clarity and prevent mis-selling.
Does this circular apply to all banks immediately?
Yes, the guidelines are applicable with immediate effect from January 13, 2010, to all commercial banks except Regional Rural Banks (RRBs).
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1765: DBOD.BP.BC.No.69/21.01.002/2009-10 — "Retail Issue of Subordinated Debt for Raising Tier II Capital" dated January 13, 2010”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2009-10/287
DBOD.BP.BC.No. 69 / 21.01.002/ 2009-10
January 13, 2010
All Commercial Banks
(excluding RRBs )
Dear Sir,
Retail Issue of Subordinated Debt for Raising Tier II Capital
Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC. 38 /21.01.002/2009-10 September 7, 2009 on ‘Issue of Subordinated Debt for Raising Tier II Capital’.
2. Some banks have indicated that they would like to issue subordinated debt to retail investors. With a view to enhancing investor education relating to risk characteristics of regulatory capital instruments, banks issuing subordinated debt to retail investors are advised to adhere to the following conditions:
a) The requirement for specific sign-off as quoted below, from the investors for having understood the features and risks of the instrument may be incorporated in the common application form of the proposed debt issue.
" By making this application, I/We acknowledge that I/We have understood the terms and conditions of the Issue of [ insert the name of the instruments being issued ] of [ Name of The Bank ] as disclosed in the Draft Shelf Prospectus, Shelf Prospectus and Tranche Document ".
b) For floating rate instruments, banks should not use its Fixed Deposit rate as benchmark.
c) All the publicity material, application form and other communication with the investor should clearly state in bold letters (with font size 14) how a subordinated bond is different from fixed deposit particularly that it is not covered by deposit insurance.
3. The guidelines contained in this circular would be applicable with immediate effect.
Yours faithfully
(B. Mahapatra)
Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/287 · issued 13 Jan 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5459&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.