HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/289

RRBs: NDTL Computation for CRR/SLR on Remittance Liabilities

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/289 · issued 18 Jan 2010 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates RRBs to include unpaid drafts issued under remittance schemes as outside liabilities in NDTL for CRR/SLR. Correspondent banks must classify received funds as liabilities to banking system, nettable against inter-bank assets.

What changed

RBI observed non-uniform practices among RRBs in accounting for remittance facility liabilities with correspondent banks. It clarified that the accepting bank's liability extinguishes only when the correspondent bank honours the draft, not upon fund transfer. Correspondent banks must now classify such funds as liabilities to the banking system, not to others.

What it means for you

RRBs must ensure that outstanding drafts under remittance schemes are included in NDTL calculations, increasing their CRR/SLR requirements. Correspondent banks can net these liabilities against inter-bank assets, potentially reducing their own reserve requirements. This standardizes accounting and prevents under-reporting of liabilities.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Correspondent banks (primarily sponsor banks) of RRBs, RBI regional offices monitoring RRB compliance

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

When does the liability of an RRB for a remittance draft extinguish?

The liability extinguishes only when the correspondent bank honours the draft issued to the customer, not when funds are transferred to the correspondent bank.

How should correspondent banks classify funds received from RRBs under remittance schemes?

Correspondent banks must show these as 'Liabilities to the Banking System' and can net them off against their inter-bank assets.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1763: RPCD.CO.RRB.BC.No.48/03.05.50/2009-10 — "Computation of Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL) for the purpose of Maintenance of CRR / SLR" dated January 18, ”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2009-10/289 RPCD.CO.RRB.BC.No.48 /03.05.50 /2009-10   January 18, 2010 All Regional Rural Banks Dear Sir, Computation of Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL) for the purpose of Maintenance of CRR/SLR It has been observed that the Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) are not following a uniform practice in reckoning their liability in respect of arrangements with correspondent banks (mainly sponsor banks) for remittance facilities. Under the arrangements, there is a transfer of funds by accepting bank to its correspondent bank and it is an obligation of the correspondent bank to honour the instruments. However, such transfer of funds and obligation of correspondent bank to honour the instruments in no way absolve the primary liability of the accepting bank issuing drafts and interest/dividend warrants to its customers. It is, therefore, advised that all RRBs should reckon the liability in the following manner: i)  When an RRB accepts funds from a client under its remittance facility scheme, it becomes a liability (Liabilities to Others) in its books. The liability of the RRB accepting funds will extinguish only when the correspondent bank honours the drafts issued by the accepting bank to its customers. As such, the balance amount in respect of the drafts issued by the RRB on its correspondent bank under the remittance facility scheme and remaining unpaid should be reflected in the RRB’s books as an outside liability and the same should also be taken into account for computation of NDTL for CRR/SLR purpose. ii)  The amount received by correspondent banks has to be shown as ' Liabilities to the Banking System ' by them and not as ' Liabilities to Others ' and this liability could be netted off by the correspondent banks against their inter-bank assets. Likewise sums placed by banks issuing drafts/interest/duplicate warrants are to be treated as Assets within banking system in their books and can be netted off from their inter-bank liabilities. 2. Please acknowledge receipt to our Regional Office concerned. Yours faithfully, (A.K.Pandey) General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/289 · issued 18 Jan 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5467&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗