HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/293

RRBs Must Follow Updated PMLA Rules on NPOs and Walk-in Customers

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/293 · issued 28 Jan 2010 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates RRBs to record NPO receipts over ₹10 lakh, report monthly to FIU-IND, and verify identity for walk-in transactions ≥₹50,000. Suspicious structuring below threshold must trigger STR filing.

What changed

The 2009 amendment to PMLA Rules introduces a definition for 'non-profit organization' and requires banks to maintain records of NPO receipts exceeding ₹10 lakh. It also mandates identity verification for non-account-based (walk-in) customers for transactions of ₹50,000 or more, and removes the earlier proviso allowing delayed verification after account opening.

What it means for you

RRBs now have enhanced compliance obligations: they must track and report large NPO inflows monthly, and verify walk-in customers for high-value transactions. The deletion of the delayed verification proviso tightens KYC timelines. Structuring transactions below ₹50,000 to avoid detection must be treated as suspicious and reported.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Compliance and AML teams at RRBs, Branch staff handling cash and walk-in transactions

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is the reporting deadline for NPO transactions over ₹10 lakh?

RRBs must forward a report to FIU-IND every month by the 15th of the succeeding month.

Do we need to verify identity for a walk-in customer doing multiple small transactions that add up to ₹50,000?

Yes, if the transactions appear connected, you must verify identity and address. If you suspect intentional structuring, also file a suspicious transaction report.

📜 This document’s life story (3 recorded events, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Amends PMLA Rules Amended: New Beneficial Owner Definition for Co-op Banks
Amends RBI's New KYC Directions for Regional Rural Banks (2025)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1760: RPCD.CORRB.AML.BC.No.49/03.05.33(E)/2009-10 — "Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure a”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2009-10/293A RPCD.CORRB.AML.BC.No.49/03.05.33(E)/2009-10 January 28, 2010 The Chairman All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) Dear Sir, Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and  Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Amendment Rules, 2009 - Obligation of Banks / Financial Institutions As you are aware, Government of India vide its Notification No.13/2009/F.No.6/8/2009-ES dated November 12, 2009, has amended the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Rules, 2005. A copy of the Notification is enclosed for ready reference . 2.  Some of the salient features of the amendment, relevant to RRBs, are as under : *   Clause (ca) inserted in sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 defines "non-profit organization." *  Clause (BA) inserted in sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 requires banks / financial institutions to maintain proper record of all transactions involving receipts by non-profit organizations of value more than rupees ten lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency. *   The amended Rule 6 provides that the records referred to in rule 3 should be maintained for a period of ten years from the date of transactions between the client and the banking company / financial institution. *  A proviso has been inserted in sub-rule (3) of Rule 8, which requires that banks / financial institutions and their employees should keep the fact of furnishing suspicious transaction information strictly confidential. *  Rule 9, now requires banks / financial institutions to verify identity of the non-account based customer while carrying out transaction of an amount equal to or exceeding rupees fifty thousand, whether conducted as a single transaction or several transactions that appear to be connected. *  The amended sub-rule (1) of Rule 9, in terms of clause (b) (ii) requires verification of identity of the customer for all international money transfer operations. *  Proviso to Rule 9(1) regarding the verification of identity of the client within a reasonable time after opening the account / execution of the transaction has been deleted. 3. Accordingly, in view of amendments to the above Rules, RRBs are required to: i)  Maintain proper record of all transactions involving receipts by non- profit organizations of value more than rupees ten lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency and to forward a report to FIU-IND of all such transactions in the prescribed format every month by the 15th of the succeeding month. ii)  In case of transactions carried out by a non-account based customer, that is a walk-in customer, where the amount of transaction is equal to or exceeds rupees fifty thousand, whether conducted as a single transaction or several transactions that appear to be connected, the customer's identity and address should be verified. Further, if a RRB has reason to believe that a customer is intentionally structuring a transaction into a series of transactions below the threshold of Rs.50,000/- the RRB should verify identity and address of the customer and also consider filing a suspicious transaction report (STR) to FIU-IND. 4. RRBs are advised to strictly follow the amended provisions of PMLA Rules  and  ensure meticulous compliance to these Rules. Yours faithfully, (A.K.Pandey) General Manager Notification No.13/2009 - Amendment to Rules
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/293 · issued 28 Jan 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5472&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗