HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/332

RBI Bans Bilateral Clearing Deals for RRBs

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/332 · issued 02 Mar 2010 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has directed all Regional Rural Banks to immediately stop bilateral clearing arrangements (e.g., direct cheque exchanges) with other banks, as these bypass official Clearing Houses, violate the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and pose systemic risks.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A payments & clearing officer in Indore used to send post-dated cheques directly to a city bank for faster payment, but now she must stop that deal. Instead, she sends every cheque through the official Clearing House, which takes a bit longer but follows RBI rules and keeps the system safe for all customers.

What changed

RBI reviewed bilateral clearing agreements between banks, including those for post-dated cheques, and found they undermine Clearing House infrastructure, increase costs, and create risks. The central bank now mandates that RRBs discontinue all such arrangements immediately, as they require RBI authorization under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007.

What it means for you

RRBs must stop direct cheque clearing deals with other banks and route all instruments through official Clearing Houses. Non-compliance invites strict penal action under the Act. This tightens oversight and reduces systemic risk, but may increase operational costs for RRBs that relied on bilateral deals for speed.

What you must do

Who it affects

All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Banks with bilateral clearing or correspondent banking arrangements, Clearing House operators and participants

❓ Common questions

What exactly are bilateral clearing arrangements?

They are direct agreements between two banks to clear cheques (like post-dated cheques) without using the official Clearing House, often involving direct credit to current accounts.

Why has RBI banned these arrangements?

RBI found they undermine Clearing House efficiency, increase costs, delay settlements, and pose systemic risks. They also violate the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, which requires RBI authorization for such payment systems.

What happens if an RRB continues such arrangements?

Continuation without RBI authorization is a violation of the Act and invites strict penal action as per its provisions.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2009-10/332 RPCD.CO RRB.BC.No.58/03.05.33/2009-10 March 2, 2010 The Chairman All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) Dear Sir, Review of bilateral clearing arrangements between banks – Regional Rural Banks As you are aware, for convenient, cost-effective and quick processing and settlement of clearing instruments arising out of normal business activities of banks, an elaborate Clearing House infrastructure is in place in the country. Currently operational at most locations across the length and breadth of the country, Clearing Houses facilitate multilateral net clearing and settlement of over four million cheques everyday on a T + 1 basis. In fact, the processing cycle in India for local cheques encompasses both the presentation and return clearing legs, and compares favourably with similar systems around the world. 2.  During the recent annual financial inspection of a bank, our Department of Banking Supervision had observed that the bank had entered into bilateral agreements with other banks for processing and clearing of post dated cheques (PDCs) deposited with it and payable by the other banks. Under the agreement, the bank was sending such PDCs directly to the other bank for realisation and receiving proceeds thereof by credit to its current account opened with the other bank. Similar facility was extended to the other bank for clearing PDCs drawn on this bank as well. On our enquiring with a few other banks, it is ascertained that a number of similar bilateral agreements exist between / among banks and in the process, significant volume of instruments was getting exchanged and cleared outside the Clearing House infrastructure. 3. After a detailed review we have concluded that such agreements (also styled as corresponding banking arrangements by some banks) undermine the existence and need of Clearing Houses and do not in any way contribute to the efficiency of the clearing system. In fact, the banks incur higher costs and take longer time to clear the cheques bilaterally. The parallel clearing arrangements vitiate the Clearing House rules, standard, minimum benchmarks and uniform practices. Malpractices and disputes between banks can exacerbate into systemic concerns. 4. Further, bilateral clearing arrangements attract provisions of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (Act) and the regulations framed thereunder. Section 2(i) of the Act defines a payment system as a 'system that enables payment to be effected between a payer and a beneficiary, involving clearing, payment or settlement service or all of them, but does not include a stock exchange'. Section 4(1) of the Act stipulates that 'no person other than the Reserve Bank shall commence or operate a payment system except under and in accordance with an authorization issued by the Reserve Bank under provisions of the Act'. Operators of such payment systems are required to seek authorization under the Act, within six months of the commencement of the Act i.e. by February 12, 2009. The bilateral arrangements between banks being inter-bank in nature fall within the ambit of payment systems and require authorization from the Reserve Bank. 5. Bilateral agreements include correspondent banking arrangements, arrangements under cash management services, or any arrangement that envisages routine clearing of cheques drawn on either or both banks without routing them through the Clearing House infrastructure as also agreements for sharing of ATMs, use of electronic clearing products like ECS or any such payment system products. Continuation or commencement of bilateral clearing arrangements without authorization is violative of the provisions of the Act and would invite strict penal action as provided under the Act. Keeping in view the various risks involved, RRBs are advised to immediately discontinue all bilateral clearing arrangements arising out of normal banking transactions. 6. Please acknowledge receipt of the circular to our Regional Office concerned for compliance. Yours faithfully, (R.C.Sarangi) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/332 · issued 02 Mar 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Who does what — compliance checklist
⚙️ Operations
  • Immediately identify and terminate all bilateral clearing agreements with other banks, including those for post-dated cheques, correspondent banking, and cash management services.
  • Route all cheque clearing through the official Clearing House infrastructure to comply with RBI norms.
  • Ensure no new bilateral clearing arrangements are entered into without prior RBI authorization.
  • Review internal processes to align with the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and avoid penal action.
📜 Compliance
  • Acknowledge receipt of this circular to your respective RBI Regional Office for compliance.
Grouped from the action items above — a single circular may involve more than one team.
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are an Operations officer at a bank this circular applies to (All Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Banks with bilateral clearing or correspondent banking arrangements, Clearing House operators and participants), your first concrete step on “RBI Bans Bilateral Clearing Deals for RRBs” is: “Immediately identify and terminate all bilateral clearing agreements with other banks, including those for post-dated cheques, correspondent banking, and cash management services.” (RBI issued this 02 Mar 2010).

  1. Circular: RBI/2009-10/332 -- RBI Bans Bilateral Clearing Deals for RRBs
  2. Issued: 02 Mar 2010
  3. Action required: Immediately identify and terminate all bilateral clearing agreements with other banks, including those for post-dated cheques, correspondent banking, and cash management services.
  4. Action required: Route all cheque clearing through the official Clearing House infrastructure to comply with RBI norms.
  5. Action required: Ensure no new bilateral clearing arrangements are entered into without prior RBI authorization.
  6. Action required: Acknowledge receipt of this circular to your respective RBI Regional Office for compliance.
  7. Action required: Review internal processes to align with the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and avoid penal action.
  8. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  9. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  10. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5518&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗