Infra Lending Boost: Annuities & Toll Rights as Tangible Security
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/421 · issued 23 Apr 2010 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI now allows banks to treat annuities and toll collection rights from road/highway BOT projects as tangible security, and reduces provisioning on sub-standard infra loans from 20% to 15%, provided cash flows are escrowed with a legal first claim.
What changed
Annuities under BOT road/highway projects and toll collection rights (with traffic shortfall compensation) are now recognized as tangible security, reversing the earlier stance that such rights were intangible. Additionally, provisioning on unsecured infrastructure loan accounts classified as sub-standard is reduced from 20% to 15%, subject to escrow and first-claim conditions.
What it means for you
Banks can now improve their secured loan classification for infrastructure exposures, potentially lowering capital requirements and provisioning costs. The reduced provisioning on sub-standard infra loans eases the P&L hit for lenders, encouraging more infrastructure financing. However, banks must set up robust escrow mechanisms and ensure legal enforceability of their claims to avail these benefits.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Review existing road/highway BOT project loans and assess if annuities or toll collection rights meet the new tangible security criteria.
Ensure legal documentation for such rights is irrevocable and legally enforceable, with clear first claim on cash flows.
Set up or verify escrow account mechanisms for infrastructure loan accounts to qualify for the lower 15% provisioning on sub-standard assets.
Update internal credit policies and provisioning frameworks to reflect the revised treatment of these securities and reduced provisioning rates.
Who it affects
Banks with exposure to road/highway BOT infrastructure projects, Credit risk and provisioning teams handling infrastructure loan portfolios, Legal and documentation teams structuring infrastructure loan agreements, Senior management and board members overseeing infrastructure lending strategy
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-19 06:39 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn03 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
What types of infrastructure projects qualify for the new tangible security treatment?
Only road/highway projects under the BOT model where annuities or toll collection rights have provisions compensating the sponsor for traffic shortfalls, and where the bank's right to receive these is legally enforceable and irrevocable.
Do all sub-standard infrastructure loans get the reduced 15% provisioning?
No, only those where the bank has an appropriate escrow mechanism for cash flows and a clear, legal first claim on those cash flows. Without these safeguards, the standard 20% provisioning for unsecured sub-standard exposures applies.
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1717: DBOD.No.BP.BC.96/08.12.014/2009-10 — "Prudential Norms on Advances to Infrastructure Sector" dated April 23, 2010”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2009-10/421
DBOD No. BP.BC. 96 / 08.12.014/ 2009-10
April 23, 2010
All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(excluding RRBs)
Dear Sir,
Prudential norms on Advances to Infrastructure Sector
Please refer to paragraphs 96 and 97 of the Annual Policy Statement for the year 2010-11 ( extract enclosed ) wherein it has been proposed (i) to treat annuities and toll collection rights as tangible securities, and (ii) to reduce the provisioning required on unsecured infrastructure loan accounts classified as sub-standard to 15 per cent.
2. In terms of paragraph 2(a) of our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.125/21.04.048/2008-09 dated April 17, 2009 on ‘Prudential Norms on Unsecured Advances’, rights, licenses, authorizations, etc. charged to banks as collateral in respect of projects (including infrastructure projects) should not be reckoned as tangible security. In partial modification to the above it has been decided that banks may treat annuities under build-operate-transfer (BOT) model in respect of road/highway projects and toll collection rights, where there are provisions to compensate the project sponsor if a certain level of traffic is not achieved, as tangible securities subject to the condition that banks’ right to receive annuities and toll collection rights is legally enforceable and irrevocable.
3. In terms of paragraph 6 of our circular No. DBOD.BP.BC.97/ 21.04.141/ 2003-04 dated June 17, 2004 on ‘Prudential Guidelines on Unsecured Exposures’ it is stipulated that unsecured exposures identified as sub- standard would attract additional provision of 10 per cent, i.e., a total of 20 per cent on the outstanding balance. In view of certain safeguards such as escrow accounts available in respect of infrastructure lending, it has been decided that infrastructure loan accounts which are classified as sub-standard will attract a provisioning of 15 per cent instead of the current prescription of 20 per cent. To avail of this benefit of lower provisioning, the banks should have in place an appropriate mechanism to escrow the cash flows and also have a clear and legal first claim on these cash flows.
Yours faithfully
(B. Mahapatra)
Chief General Manager
Extract of paragraphs 96 and 97 of the Annual Policy Statement for the year 2010-11
96. In terms of extant instructions, rights, licenses and authorisations of borrowers, charged to banks as collateral in respect of project loans (including infrastructure projects) are not eligible for being reckoned as tangible security for the purpose of classifying an advance as secured loan. As toll collection rights and annuities in the case of road/highway projects confer certain material benefits to lenders, it is proposed:
to treat annuities under build-operate-transfer (BOT) model in respect of road/highway projects and toll collection rights, where there are provisions to compensate the project sponsor if a certain level of traffic is not achieved, as tangible securities subject to the condition that banks’ right to receive annuities and toll collection rights is legally enforceable and irrevocable. 97. Till June 2004, the Reserve Bank had prescribed a limit on banks’ unsecured exposures. As a step towards deregulation, the above limit was withdrawn to enable banks’ Boards to formulate their own policies on unsecured exposures. The provisioning requirement for unsecured sub-standard exposures, however, was increased to 20 per cent consequent to the withdrawal of limits on banks’ unsecured exposures (the provisioning requirement for secured sub-standard exposures stands at 10 per cent). In view of certain safeguards such as escrow accounts available in respect of infrastructure lending, it is proposed that:
infrastructure loan accounts classified as sub-standard will attract a provisioning of 15 per cent instead of the current prescription of 20 per cent. To avail of this benefit of lower provisioning, banks should have in place an appropriate mechanism to escrow the cash flows and also have a clear and legal first claim on such cash flows.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2009-10/421 · issued 23 Apr 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5619&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.