HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/490

RBI bars lawyers, CAs from holding client accounts if confidentiality blocks KYC

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 10 Jun 2010  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 15:02 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI has clarified that professional intermediaries like lawyers and chartered accountants cannot open or hold bank accounts for clients if their professional confidentiality rules prevent disclosing the true client identity to the bank. Banks must ensure they can identify beneficial owners.

What changed

RBI reiterated that banks must not allow professional intermediaries bound by client confidentiality (e.g., lawyers, CAs) to open or hold accounts on behalf of clients if they cannot disclose the true owner. This reinforces existing KYC/AML rules from the July 2009 Master Circular, specifically paragraph 2.5(iii) and 2.4(a).

What it means for you

Banks must now strictly enforce that any pooled or escrow accounts managed by lawyers, CAs, or similar intermediaries are only permitted if the intermediary can fully disclose the beneficial owner's identity. Failure to comply with this directive, issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, may attract penalties. This closes a potential loophole for money laundering through professional intermediaries.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), All India Financial Institutions, Local Area Banks, Compliance and KYC/AML teams, Professional intermediaries (lawyers, chartered accountants, stockbrokers) managing client funds

Can a lawyer open a client escrow account if they agree to disclose the client's identity?

Yes, if the lawyer can and does disclose the true identity of the beneficial owner to the bank, the account may be allowed. The key condition is that the intermediary must not be bound by any confidentiality that prevents such disclosure.

What happens if a bank already has such an account from a lawyer who refuses to disclose client details?

The bank must not allow the account to continue. It should be closed or frozen, as per the circular. Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

Does this apply to mutual funds or pension funds managed by intermediaries?

No, the circular specifically allows pooled accounts for entities like mutual funds and pension funds, as long as the bank can identify beneficial owners when funds are not co-mingled or can look through when co-mingled. The restriction targets intermediaries bound by client confidentiality.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 15:02 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5719&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.