HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/504

RRBs Barred from Client Accounts via Lawyers, CAs

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 23 Jun 2010  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 14:54 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI has directed RRBs to not open or maintain accounts held by professional intermediaries like lawyers and CAs who cannot disclose the client's identity due to confidentiality obligations. This reinforces KYC/AML norms under PMLA, 2002.

What changed

RBI reiterated that RRBs must not allow professional intermediaries bound by client confidentiality (e.g., lawyers, chartered accountants) to open or hold accounts on behalf of clients. The earlier 2005 circular's guidance on pooled accounts and beneficial owner identification is now explicitly applied to bar such intermediaries who cannot reveal the true account owner.

What it means for you

RRBs must now reject account applications from lawyers, CAs, or similar professionals if they cite confidentiality to hide the beneficial owner. This tightens AML/CFT compliance and prevents misuse of pooled accounts for money laundering. Banks face penalties under the Banking Regulation Act for non-compliance.

What you must do

Who it affects

Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), Lawyers and Chartered Accountants acting as professional intermediaries, Clients using pooled accounts through intermediaries

Can an RRB still hold a pooled account for a mutual fund or pension fund?

Yes, but only if the intermediary can identify all beneficial owners. If the intermediary is bound by confidentiality (e.g., a lawyer), the account is not allowed.

What happens if an RRB already has such an account?

The bank must review and close the account if the intermediary cannot disclose the true owner. Non-compliance may attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act.

Does this apply to all professional intermediaries or only lawyers and CAs?

It applies to any professional intermediary (e.g., stockbrokers, accountants) who is under an obligation that prevents the bank from knowing the beneficial owner.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 14:54 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5742&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.