HomeCirculars › RBI/2009-10/507

StCBs/DCCBs: No Anonymous Accounts via Professional Intermediaries

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 25 Jun 2010  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 14:54 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI bars StCBs and DCCBs from opening accounts for clients through lawyers, CAs, or other intermediaries who cannot disclose the beneficial owner due to client confidentiality. Banks must identify and verify the true owner behind any pooled or escrow account.

What changed

RBI reiterated that professional intermediaries bound by client confidentiality (e.g., lawyers, CAs) cannot hold accounts on behalf of clients. Banks must ensure they can identify the beneficial owner; if confidentiality prevents this, the account must not be opened or maintained.

What it means for you

StCBs and DCCBs must now reject or close any account where a professional intermediary refuses to reveal the client's identity due to confidentiality. This tightens AML/CFT compliance and prevents misuse of pooled accounts for money laundering. Banks face penalties under the Banking Regulation Act for non-compliance.

What you must do

Who it affects

State and District Central Co-operative Banks (StCBs/DCCBs), Professional intermediaries (lawyers, chartered accountants, stockbrokers) managing client funds, Compliance and KYC teams at co-operative banks

Can a lawyer open an account for a client if they disclose the client's identity?

Yes, if the lawyer can and does disclose the true identity of the beneficial owner, the account can be opened. The bank must verify the client's identity as per KYC norms.

What happens if a professional intermediary refuses to share client details due to confidentiality?

The bank must not open or maintain such an account. Continuing to hold it would violate AML/CFT guidelines and attract penalties under the Banking Regulation Act.

Does this apply to pooled accounts managed by stockbrokers?

Yes. For pooled accounts where funds are co-mingled, the bank must still identify the beneficial owners. If the intermediary cannot disclose them, the account cannot be held.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 14:54 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5745&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.