Home › Circulars › RBI/2010-11/172

HTM Sale Cap: 5% Threshold Triggers Disclosure

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/172 · issued 18 Aug 2010 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI caps HTM sales/transfers at 5% of book value for FIs; exceeding triggers mandatory market value disclosure in annual accounts. Effective immediately.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

Rahul, a credit & lending officer in Indore, noticed that his bank's HTM portfolio had exceeded the 5% threshold. He arranged for the market value disclosure and excess book-over-market provision in the annual accounts, ensuring transparency and compliance with RBI regulations.

What changed

RBI observed banks frequently selling HTM securities to book profits, undermining the 'hold to maturity' intent. To discourage this, a 5% threshold on sales/transfers from HTM was introduced. Exceeding it requires FIs to disclose HTM market value and any unprovided depreciation in notes to accounts.

What it means for you

FIs can no longer freely churn HTM portfolios for gains without disclosure consequences. The 5% cap forces disciplined portfolio management; exceeding it exposes hidden MTM losses. This aligns FIs with bank norms, reducing regulatory arbitrage and promoting genuine long-term holding.

What you must do

Who it affects

All-India Term Lending and Refinancing Institutions (Exim Bank, NABARD, NHB, SIDBI), FI treasury and compliance departments, Auditors reviewing FI annual financial statements

❓ Common questions

What is the 5% threshold based on?

It is 5% of the book value of HTM investments held at the beginning of the accounting year.

What happens if we exceed the 5% limit?

You must disclose the market value of HTM investments and the excess of book value over market value for which no provision has been made, in the 'Notes to Accounts' of audited annual financial statements.

Does this apply to banks as well?

The circular specifically addresses All-India Term Lending and Refinancing Institutions, but similar norms for banks were already in place.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2010-11/172 DBOD.FID.FIC.5/01.02.00/2010-11 August 18, 2010 The CEOs of the All-India Term Lending and Refinancing Institutions (Exim Bank, NABARD, NHB and SIDBI) Dear Sir Sale of Investments held under Held to Maturity (HTM) category In terms of our Master Circular No.DBOD.FID.FIC.3/01.02.00/2010-11 dated July 1, 2010 on 'Prudential Norms for Classification, Valuation and Operation of Investment Portfolio by FIs', securities acquired by FIs with the intention to hold them up to maturity may be classified under Held to Maturity (HTM) category. FIs are, however, allowed to shift investments to/from HTM with the approval of the Board of Directors once a year.  Such shifting is normally allowed at the beginning of the accounting year and no further shifting to/from HTM is allowed during the remaining part of that accounting year. 2. In this connection, it has been observed that many banks are resorting to sale of securities held under HTM category, that too frequently, to take advantage of favourable market conditions and to book profits.  It needs to be reiterated that securities under HTM category are intended to be held till maturity and accordingly are not required to be marked to market. 3. In order to discourage any such practice among FIs and for sake of uniformity, it has been decided that if the value of sales and transfers of securities to/from HTM category exceeds 5 per cent of the book value of investments held in HTM category at the beginning of the year, FIs should disclose the market value of the investments held in the HTM category and indicate the excess of book value over market value for which provision is not made.  This disclosure is required to be made in 'Notes to Accounts' in FIs' audited Annual Financial Statements. 4. These guidelines come into force with immediate effect. Yours faithfully (Vinay Baijal) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/172 · issued 18 Aug 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
🛠 Banker’s toolkit — checklists & reply templates →
Related circulars · Department of Regulation
SFB Pillar 3 Disclosure Norms Aligned with BaselUCB Deposit Rate Disclosure & Uniformity Rules UpdatedLAB Deposit Rate Disclosure & Uniformity Rules TightenedPayments Banks: Interest Rates Must Match Disclosed ScheduleRBI Updates Bulk Deposit Rate Rules and Disclosure Timing
Browse all departments →
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (All-India Term Lending and Refinancing Institutions (Exim Bank, NABARD, NHB, SIDBI), FI treasury and compliance departments, Auditors reviewing FI annual financial statements), your first concrete step on “HTM Sale Cap: 5% Threshold Triggers Disclosure” is: “Monitor HTM sales/transfers against 5% book value threshold at year-start.” (RBI issued this 18 Aug 2010).

  1. Circular: RBI/2010-11/172 -- HTM Sale Cap: 5% Threshold Triggers Disclosure
  2. Issued: 18 Aug 2010
  3. Action required: Monitor HTM sales/transfers against 5% book value threshold at year-start.
  4. Action required: If threshold is breached, arrange for market value disclosure and excess book-over-market provision in annual accounts.
  5. Action required: Review HTM classification policies to avoid frequent shifts; obtain Board approval for any planned transfers.
  6. Action required: Train treasury teams on the new disclosure trigger to prevent inadvertent non-compliance.
  7. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  8. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  9. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5952&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
—