HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-11/368

RBI Tightens End-Use Monitoring of Loan Funds

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/368 · issued 14 Jan 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI found banks lax in tracking loan usage, enabling fund diversion. Banks must now strengthen post-sanction supervision, including scrutiny of progress reports, site visits, stock audits, and borrower certifications, to ensure funds are used as approved.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

Rohit, a loan officer in Indore, approves a term loan for a textile unit. He schedules a site visit, checks the factory’s inventory, reviews the monthly progress report and financial statements, and asks the owner to sign a certificate confirming the loan was used to buy new looms, exactly as the RBI rule requires.

What changed

RBI reviewed bank practices and found that term loan disbursements were often credited to current/cash credit accounts and used for daily operations, bypassing end-use checks. Banks also relied too heavily on auditor certificates without independent verification. The circular mandates banks to evaluate and strengthen their post-sanction monitoring systems with specific measures like periodic inspections, stock audits, and borrower certifications.

What it means for you

Banks must overhaul their loan monitoring processes to prevent fund diversion, which can lead to NPAs and reputational risk. This will increase operational costs for compliance but will improve credit discipline and asset quality. Lenders need to integrate these checks into their credit risk management frameworks and ensure branch-level adherence.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), Credit risk and monitoring teams, Branch managers and loan officers, Internal audit and inspection departments

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Why did RBI issue this circular on end-use monitoring?

RBI found that some banks were not exercising adequate due diligence, leading to diversion of loan funds by borrowers. For example, term loan disbursements were being credited to current accounts and used for day-to-day operations instead of the intended purpose.

What specific actions must banks take to comply?

Banks must evaluate and strengthen their post-sanction supervision, including scrutiny of progress reports, regular site visits, inspection of securities, stock audits based on exposure, and obtaining borrower certificates. They should also consider separate auditor mandates for detecting fund diversion.

How does this affect borrowers?

Borrowers will face stricter monitoring of fund utilization, including periodic inspections and certification requirements. Incorrect certification may lead to withdrawal of facilities or legal action, promoting a healthier credit culture.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #134: DBS.CO.PPD.BC.No.5/11.01.005/2010-11 — "End Use of Funds - Monitoring" dated January 14, 2011”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2010-11/368 DBS.CO.PPD.BC.No. 5/11.01.005/2010-11 January 14, 2011 The Chairman/Chief Executives Officer All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir, End Use of Funds - Monitoring The Reserve Bank, as a part of ongoing supervision, had undertaken an assessment of the practices in vogue at certain banks for ensuring the end use of funds. The review revealed that the expected level of due diligence had not been exercised in some cases facilitating diversion of funds by the borrowers. The shortcomings, amongst others, included, crediting of term loan disbursements to the current/cash credit accounts of borrowers and utilisation thereof for day-to-day operations, as also, exclusive reliance on Chartered Accountants’ certification both in regard to infusion of promoters' contribution and deployment of banks' funds. 2. In the context of the above, it is advised that the efficacy of the existing machinery in your bank for post-sanction supervision and follow-up of advances may please be evaluated and made robust, wherever considered necessary. Illustratively, the systems and procedures may broadly include the following: meaningful scrutiny of the periodical progress reports and operating/financial statements of the borrowers; regular visits to the assisted units and inspection of securities charged/ hypothecated to the banks; periodical scrutiny of the books of accounts of the borrowers; introduction of stock audits depending upon the extent of exposure; obtention of certificates from the borrowers that the funds have been utilised for the purposes approved and in case of incorrect certification, initiation of prompt action as may be warranted, which may include withdrawal of the facilities sanctioned and legal recourse as well. In case a specific certification regarding diversion/siphoning of funds is desired from the auditors of the borrowers, a separate mandate may be awarded to them and appropriate covenants incorporated in the loan agreements; and examination of all aspects of diversion of funds during internal audit/ inspection of the branches and at the time of periodical reviews. 3. As would be appreciated, effective monitoring of the end use of funds lent is of critical importance in safeguarding a bank’s interest. Further, this would also act as a deterrent for borrowers to misuse the credit facilities sanctioned, and in the process, help build a healthy credit culture in the Indian banking system. 4. Please acknowledge receipt. Yours faithfully, (Dr.N. Krishnamohan) Chief General Manager-In-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/368 · issued 14 Jan 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6215&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗