HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-11/392

RBI Updates AML/CFT Guidance for NBFCs on Iran and North Korea

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 28 Jan 2011  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 20 Jun 2026, 10:54 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI directs all NBFCs and RNBCs to take into account AML/CFT risks from Iran and North Korea when dealing with entities from these jurisdictions, following FATF's October 22, 2010 statement.

What changed

RBI updated its earlier AML/CFT circular (September 22, 2010) to reflect FATF's October 22, 2010 statement. Iran is now subject to countermeasures due to ongoing ML/FT risks, while North Korea (DPRK) is flagged for strategic deficiencies without a committed action plan. The earlier list of eight jurisdictions (Iran, Angola, DPRK, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Sao Tome and Principe) was narrowed to two.

What it means for you

NBFCs must apply enhanced due diligence and consider countermeasures for transactions involving Iran, and assess risks for North Korea. This increases compliance burden and may restrict business relationships with entities from these countries. Lenders need to update their AML policies and train staff accordingly.

What you must do

Who it affects

All Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), Residuary Non-Banking Companies (RNBCs), Principal Officers of NBFCs/RNBCs

Which countries are specifically mentioned in this circular?

Iran is subject to countermeasures, and Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) has strategic AML/CFT deficiencies without a committed action plan.

What should NBFCs do differently for Iran compared to North Korea?

For Iran, NBFCs must apply countermeasures to protect the financial system. For North Korea, they need to consider the risks from deficiencies but no mandatory countermeasures are called for.

Does this circular replace the earlier September 2010 circular?

It updates the earlier circular by narrowing the list of deficient jurisdictions to two based on FATF's October 22, 2010 statement. The earlier guidance on other countries is superseded.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 20 Jun 2026, 10:54 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6243&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.