HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-11/485

RBI Revises Provisioning Coverage Ratio Norms for Banks

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/485 · issued 21 Apr 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has relaxed the 70% Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) requirement, making it a one-time target as of September 30, 2010. Surplus provisions must be segregated into a countercyclical provisioning buffer, usable only with RBI approval during downturns.

What changed

Previously, banks were required to maintain a 70% PCR on gross NPAs on an ongoing basis. Now, the 70% PCR is a one-time requirement as of September 30, 2010, and any surplus provisions must be set aside in a 'countercyclical provisioning buffer' account. Banks that missed the September 30, 2010 deadline must calculate the shortfall and seek RBI approval for additional time beyond March 31, 2011.

What it means for you

This change reduces the ongoing provisioning burden for banks that have already met the 70% PCR target, freeing up capital for lending. The countercyclical buffer provides a cushion for future downturns but restricts its use without RBI approval, ensuring prudent risk management. Banks with shortfalls face pressure to build provisions quickly or seek extensions.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Banks that have already achieved 70% PCR, Banks that received extensions to meet the 70% PCR target

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Is the 70% PCR still an ongoing requirement?

No, it is now a one-time requirement as of September 30, 2010. Banks that met it do not need to maintain it continuously, but surplus provisions must be held in a countercyclical buffer.

What happens if my bank didn't meet the 70% PCR by September 30, 2010?

You must calculate the shortfall as of that date and build it up as soon as possible. If you need more time beyond March 31, 2011, you must reassess and seek RBI approval.

Can we use the countercyclical provisioning buffer for any purpose?

No, it can only be used for making specific provisions for NPAs during a system-wide downturn, and only with prior RBI approval.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1533: DBOD.No.BP.BC.87/21.04.048/2010-11 — "Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) for Advances" dated April 21, 2011”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2010-11/485 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 87/21.04.048/2010-11 April 21, 2011 The Chairman and Managing Director/ Chief Executive Officer All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs) Dear Sir/ Madam Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) for Advances Please refer to the circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.64/21.04.048/2009-10 dated December 1, 2009 , in terms of which a Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) of 70 percent of gross NPAs was prescribed, as a macro-prudential measure, with a view to augmenting provisioning buffer in a counter-cyclical manner when the banks were making good profits. 2. Majority of the banks have since achieved the PCR of 70 percent and have been representing to RBI whether the prescribed PCR is required to be maintained on an ongoing basis. 3. The matter has been examined by us and till such time RBI introduces a more comprehensive methodology of countercyclical provisioning taking into account the international standards as are being currently developed by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and other provisioning norms, banks are advised that  : the PCR of 70 percent may be with reference to the gross NPA position in banks as on September 30, 2010; the surplus of the provision under PCR vis-a-vis as required as per prudential norms should be segregated into an account styled as “countercyclical provisioning buffer”, computation of which may be undertaken as per the annexed format ; and this buffer will be allowed to be used by banks for making specific provisions for NPAs during periods of system wide downturn, with the prior approval of RBI. 4. Some of the banks that had been granted extension of time beyond the stipulated date i.e. September 30, 2010 for achieving the PCR of 70 percent on their request, should calculate the required provisions for 70 percent PCR as on September 30, 2010 and compute the shortfall therefrom. This shortfall should be built up at the earliest and these banks should reassess the further time required beyond March 31, 2011, if any, to build up the buffer and seek approval from RBI. 5. As hitherto, the PCR should be disclosed in the Notes to Accounts to the Balance Sheet. Yours faithfully (B. Mahapatra) Chief General Manager-in-Charge Annex Format for Computing Countercyclical Provisioning Buffer Amount in Rs. in Crores
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/485 · issued 21 Apr 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6357&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗