HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/106

RBI caps bank investments in liquid/short term debt MFs at 10% of net worth

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/106 · issued 05 Jul 2011 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI has capped banks' total investment in liquid/short term debt mutual fund schemes at 10% of net worth as of previous March 31, to curb systemic risk from circular fund flows between banks and MFs.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A branch operations officer in Indore checks her bank's treasury report and sees that the bank has invested 12% of its net worth in a liquid mutual fund. She reminds the treasury team that they must sell some of those fund units within six months to bring the investment down to 10%, as per the RBI rule, to avoid the risk of a sudden cash crunch if many banks try to redeem at once.

What changed

RBI introduced a prudential cap of 10% of net worth on banks' investments in liquid/short term debt mutual fund schemes with weighted average maturity up to 1 year. Banks exceeding this limit must comply within six months from July 5, 2011.

What it means for you

Banks must now monitor and limit their exposure to these MF schemes to avoid liquidity risk from simultaneous redemptions. This reduces the circular flow of funds where banks invest in MFs that lend back to banks via CBLO/repo and invest in bank CDs, which could amplify stress.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Treasury and investment departments of banks, Mutual funds offering liquid/short term debt schemes

❓ Common questions

What is the basis for the 10% cap?

The cap is 10% of the bank's net worth as on March 31 of the previous financial year.

Which mutual fund schemes are covered?

Liquid/short term debt schemes (by any name) with weighted average maturity of the portfolio not exceeding 1 year.

What if my bank already exceeds the limit?

You have up to six months from July 5, 2011 to bring investments within the 10% cap.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
The guidelines have been repealed. Please refer to the Reserve Bank of India (Classification, Valuation and Operation of Investment Portfolio of Commercial Banks) Directions, 2021 . RBI/2011-12/106 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 23/21.04.141/2011-12 July 5, 2011 The Chairmen & Managing Directors/ Chief Executive Officers of All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding Regional Rural Banks) Dear Sir, Investment by banks in liquid/short term debt schemes of mutual funds Please refer to paragraph 112 of the Monetary Policy Statement 2011-12 ( extract enclosed ) wherein it has been indicated that banks’ investments in liquid schemes of mutual funds have grown manifold. The liquid schemes continue to rely heavily on institutional investors such as commercial banks whose redemption requirements are likely to be large and simultaneous; on the other hand, they are large lenders in the over-night markets such as collateralised borrowing and lending obligation (CBLO) and market repo, where banks are large borrowers. The various schemes of mutual funds also invest heavily in certificates of deposit (CDs) of banks. Such circular flow of funds between banks and mutual funds could lead to systemic risk in times of stress/liquidity crunch. Thus, banks could potentially face a large liquidity risk. It is, therefore, felt prudent to place certain limits on banks’ investments in liquid/short term debt schemes of mutual funds. 2. Accordingly, it has been decided that the total investment by banks in liquid/short term debt schemes (by whatever name called) of mutual funds with  weighted average maturity of portfolio of not more than 1 year, will be subject to a prudential cap of 10 per cent of their net worth as on March 31 of the previous year. The weighted average maturity would be calculated as average of the remaining period of maturity of securities weighted by the sums invested. 3. With a view to ensuring a smooth transition, banks which are already having investments in these schemes of mutual funds in excess of the 10 per cent limit, are allowed to comply with this requirement at the earliest but not later than six months from the date of this circular. Yours faithfully, (A.K. Khound) Chief General Manager Encl: As above Investments in Debt Oriented Mutual Funds 112. It has been observed that banks’ investments in liquid schemes of debt oriented mutual funds (DoMFs) have grown manifold. The liquid schemes continue to rely heavily on institutional investors such as commercial banks whose redemption requirements are likely to be large and simultaneous. DoMFs, on the other hand, are large lenders in the over-night markets such as collateralised borrowing and lending obligation (CBLO) and market repo, where banks are large borrowers. DoMFs invest heavily in certificates of deposit (CDs) of banks. Such circular flow of funds between banks and DoMFs could lead to systemic risk in times of stress/liquidity crunch. Thus, banks could potentially face a large liquidity risk. It is, therefore, felt prudent to place certain limits on banks’ investments in DoMFs. Accordingly, it is proposed: • that the investment in liquid schemes of DoMFs by banks will be subject to a prudential cap of 10 per cent of their net worth as on March 31 of the previous year. However, with a view to ensuring a smooth transition, banks which are already having investments in DoMFs in excess of the 10 per cent limit, will be allowed to comply with this requirement in six months’ time.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/106 · issued 05 Jul 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6602&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗