RBI caps bank investments in liquid/short term debt MFs at 10% of net worth
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/106 · issued 05 Jul 2011 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI has capped banks' total investment in liquid/short term debt mutual fund schemes at 10% of net worth as of previous March 31, to curb systemic risk from circular fund flows between banks and MFs.
The rule, in the simplest words
Banks cannot put more than 10% of their net worth (total assets minus debts) into liquid/short term debt mutual funds (funds that invest in short-term loans and bonds).
The limit is based on the bank's net worth as of March 31 of the previous year.
Only mutual fund schemes with a weighted average maturity (average time until the fund's investments are paid back) of 1 year or less count toward this limit.
If a bank already has more than 10% invested, it must reduce that amount within 6 months from July 5, 2011.
How it plays out — a real example
A branch operations officer in Indore checks her bank's treasury report and sees that the bank has invested 12% of its net worth in a liquid mutual fund. She reminds the treasury team that they must sell some of those fund units within six months to bring the investment down to 10%, as per the RBI rule, to avoid the risk of a sudden cash crunch if many banks try to redeem at once.
What changed
RBI introduced a prudential cap of 10% of net worth on banks' investments in liquid/short term debt mutual fund schemes with weighted average maturity up to 1 year. Banks exceeding this limit must comply within six months from July 5, 2011.
What it means for you
Banks must now monitor and limit their exposure to these MF schemes to avoid liquidity risk from simultaneous redemptions. This reduces the circular flow of funds where banks invest in MFs that lend back to banks via CBLO/repo and invest in bank CDs, which could amplify stress.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Calculate total investment in liquid/short term debt MF schemes (WAM ≤1 year) as a percentage of net worth as of March 31, 2011.
Ensure compliance with the 10% cap; if exceeded, reduce exposure within six months.
Review and adjust investment policies to align with the new prudential limit.
Monitor weighted average maturity of MF portfolios to ensure it stays within 1 year.
Who it affects
All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Treasury and investment departments of banks, Mutual funds offering liquid/short term debt schemes
❓ Common questions
What is the basis for the 10% cap?
The cap is 10% of the bank's net worth as on March 31 of the previous financial year.
Which mutual fund schemes are covered?
Liquid/short term debt schemes (by any name) with weighted average maturity of the portfolio not exceeding 1 year.
What if my bank already exceeds the limit?
You have up to six months from July 5, 2011 to bring investments within the 10% cap.
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
The guidelines have been repealed. Please refer to the Reserve Bank of India (Classification, Valuation and Operation of Investment Portfolio of Commercial Banks) Directions, 2021 .
RBI/2011-12/106
DBOD.No.BP.BC. 23/21.04.141/2011-12
July 5, 2011
The Chairmen & Managing Directors/
Chief Executive Officers of
All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(excluding Regional Rural Banks)
Dear Sir,
Investment by banks in liquid/short term debt schemes of mutual funds
Please refer to paragraph 112 of the Monetary Policy Statement 2011-12 ( extract enclosed ) wherein it has been indicated that banks’ investments in liquid schemes of mutual funds have grown manifold. The liquid schemes continue to rely heavily on institutional investors such as commercial banks whose redemption requirements are likely to be large and simultaneous; on the other hand, they are large lenders in the over-night markets such as collateralised borrowing and lending obligation (CBLO) and market repo, where banks are large borrowers. The various schemes of mutual funds also invest heavily in certificates of deposit (CDs) of banks. Such circular flow of funds between banks and mutual funds could lead to systemic risk in times of stress/liquidity crunch. Thus, banks could potentially face a large liquidity risk. It is, therefore, felt prudent to place certain limits on banks’ investments in liquid/short term debt schemes of mutual funds.
2. Accordingly, it has been decided that the total investment by banks in liquid/short term debt schemes (by whatever name called) of mutual funds with weighted average maturity of portfolio of not more than 1 year, will be subject to a prudential cap of 10 per cent of their net worth as on March 31 of the previous year. The weighted average maturity would be calculated as average of the remaining period of maturity of securities weighted by the sums invested.
3. With a view to ensuring a smooth transition, banks which are already having investments in these schemes of mutual funds in excess of the 10 per cent limit, are allowed to comply with this requirement at the earliest but not later than six months from the date of this circular.
Yours faithfully,
(A.K. Khound)
Chief General Manager
Encl: As above
Investments in Debt Oriented Mutual Funds
112. It has been observed that banks’ investments in liquid schemes of debt oriented mutual funds (DoMFs) have grown manifold. The liquid schemes continue to rely heavily on institutional investors such as commercial banks whose redemption requirements are likely to be large and simultaneous. DoMFs, on the other hand, are large lenders in the over-night markets such as collateralised borrowing and lending obligation (CBLO) and market repo, where banks are large borrowers. DoMFs invest heavily in certificates of deposit (CDs) of banks. Such circular flow of funds between banks and DoMFs could lead to systemic risk in times of stress/liquidity crunch. Thus, banks could potentially face a large liquidity risk. It is, therefore, felt prudent to place certain limits on banks’ investments in DoMFs. Accordingly, it is proposed:
• that the investment in liquid schemes of DoMFs by banks will be subject to a prudential cap of 10 per cent of their net worth as on March 31 of the previous year. However, with a view to ensuring a smooth transition, banks which are already having investments in DoMFs in excess of the 10 per cent limit, will be allowed to comply with this requirement in six months’ time.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/106 · issued 05 Jul 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6602&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.