HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/217

Revised Credit Rating Symbols for Basel II Capital Adequacy

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/217 · issued 13 Oct 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates banks to use new rating symbols from CARE, CRISIL, FITCH India, and ICRA for risk-weighting exposures under Basel II. Long-term symbols now include agency prefix; short-term ratings shift to A1-A4 and D scale. No change in rating methodology or existing ratings.

What changed

SEBI standardized rating symbols and definitions for all credit rating agencies, effective June 15, 2011. Long-term rating symbols now carry the agency's name as a prefix (e.g., CRISIL AAA). Short-term ratings moved to a uniform A1-A4 and D scale, replacing earlier symbols like P1-P5. The four accredited CRAs have updated their symbols accordingly.

What it means for you

Banks must update their internal systems to map the new rating symbols to the same risk weights as before under the Standardised Approach of Basel II. The change is purely cosmetic—rating methodology and existing ratings remain unaffected. This ensures consistency across agencies and aligns with SEBI's harmonization effort.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding LABs and RRBs), Credit risk management teams, Treasury and investment departments, Compliance and regulatory reporting units

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Do the revised rating symbols change the risk weights for our existing loan exposures?

No. The circular explicitly states that the rating methodology and existing ratings remain unchanged. Only the symbols have been revised; the corresponding risk weights under the Basel II Standardised Approach stay the same.

How should we handle short-term ratings that were previously P1, P2, etc.?

Map the old short-term symbols to the new A1-A4 scale as per the annex in the circular. For example, P1 becomes A1, P2 becomes A2, and so on. The risk weight for each category remains identical.

Is this change applicable only to new ratings or also to existing ones?

The circular advises banks to use the revised symbols for new ratings and reviews going forward. Existing ratings retain their original symbols and risk weights until they are reviewed or renewed.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1430: DBOD.No.BP.BC.39/21.06.007/2011-12 — "Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF) - Revision of Ra”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/217 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 39 /21.06.007/2011-12 October 13, 2011 The Chairman / CMD / MD / CEO All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding LABs and RRBs) Dear Sir, Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF) - Revision of Rating Symbols and Definitions of Credit Rating Agencies Please refer to the Master Circular No. DBOD.No.BP.BC.11/21.06.001/2010-11 dated July 1, 2011 on 'Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF)' by which the consolidated prudential guidelines had been issued to banks on the captioned subject. 2. In terms of para 6 of the circular, four domestic credit rating agencies viz. CARE, CRISIL, FITCH India and ICRA have been accredited for the purpose of risk weighting the banks' claims for capital adequacy purposes. The long term and short term ratings issued by the chosen domestic credit rating agencies have been mapped to the appropriate risk weights applicable as per the Standardised Approach under the Basel II Framework. 3. SEBI has, vide its circular CIR/MIRSD/4/2011 dated June 15, 2011 on 'Standardisation of Rating Symbols and Definitions', instructed Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) registered with SEBI to adopt common rating symbols and rating definitions, which shall henceforth be used for the new ratings / reviews by the CRAs. Under the revised standardized system, there is no change in the long term rating symbols except that rating symbols will henceforth display the rating agency's name as a prefix. In case of short term ratings, a rating scale denoted by 'A' on a scale of '1' to '4' (i.e. A1, A2, A3 and A4) and 'D' has been prescribed. The four accredited CRAs, which are registered with SEBI, have therefore revised their rating symbols of long term and short term debt instruments. The new rating symbols of the chosen CRAs vis-à-vis their old rating symbols for long term and short term instruments are furnished in Annex for ready reference. 4. The aforesaid change in rating symbols and definitions however does not effect, in any manner, the rating methodology followed by the CRAs for rating such instruments and will have no bearing on the existing ratings assigned by the CRAs under the Basel-II framework. 5. In view of above, banks are advised that they should henceforth use the revised rating symbols of the credit rating agencies with the corresponding guidance in the master circular under reference for the purpose of assigning risk weights to the various exposures. 6. All other provisions regarding external credit ratings of the master circular remain unchanged. Yours faithfully, (Deepak Singhal) Chief General Manager-in-charge Annex Revised Rating Symbols of CARE, CRISIL, FITCH and ICRA CARE Long-Term Debt instruments
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/217 · issued 13 Oct 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6758&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗