HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/248

RBI Clarifies Repayment Rules for Joint Fixed Deposits

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/248 · issued 04 Nov 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has clarified that banks must honor 'Either or Survivor' or 'Former or Survivor' mandates for joint fixed deposits on maturity, without requiring both depositors' signatures, to avoid delays and poor customer service.

What changed

RBI observed that some banks were insisting on signatures of both depositors for repayment of joint fixed deposits even when the account had 'Either or Survivor' or 'Former or Survivor' instructions, making the mandate redundant. The circular clarifies that for 'Either or Survivor' accounts, only one signature is needed on maturity; for 'Former or Survivor', the 'Former' alone can operate when both are alive. Premature withdrawals still require both signatures unless a specific joint mandate allows otherwise.

What it means for you

Banks must update their standard operating procedures to ensure that joint fixed deposit repayments on maturity are processed as per the mandate without unnecessary delays. This reduces customer complaints and operational friction. However, premature withdrawals remain subject to stricter controls, requiring both depositors' consent or, in case of death, concurrence of legal heirs.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs), Retail banking operations handling fixed deposits, Branch managers and customer service teams, Compliance and legal departments

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Can a survivor withdraw a fixed deposit on maturity if the other joint holder dies before maturity?

Yes, for 'Either or Survivor' accounts, the survivor can withdraw on maturity without legal heirs' consent. For 'Former or Survivor', if the former dies before maturity, the survivor can withdraw on maturity. Premature withdrawal in such cases requires consent of the survivor and legal heirs of the deceased.

What if customers want premature withdrawals also to follow the 'Either or Survivor' mandate?

Banks can allow this if they obtain a specific joint mandate from both depositors authorizing premature withdrawals under the same operating instructions. Without such a mandate, both signatures are required for premature withdrawal.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1418: DBOD.No.Leg.BC.46/09.07.005/2011-12 — "Repayment of Term / Fixed Deposits in Banks" dated November 4, 2011”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/248 DBOD No. Leg BC 46/09.07.005/2011-12 November 4, 2011 All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir, Repayment of Term/Fixed Deposits in banks It has come to our notice that some banks insist on the signatures of both the depositors to allow repayment of money in fixed/term deposits, though the deposit account is opened with operating instructions (sometimes called ‘repayment instructions’), ‘Either or Survivor’ or ‘Former or Survivor’. Such insistence on the signatures of both the depositors has the effect of making the mandate given by the depositors redundant. This, in turn, results in unjustified delays and allegations of poor customer service. 2. In this connection, it is clarified that if fixed/term deposit accounts are opened with operating instructions ‘Either or Survivor’, the signatures of both the depositors need not be obtained for payment of the amount of the deposits on maturity. However, the signatures of both the depositors may have to be obtained, in case the deposit is to be paid before maturity. If the operating instruction is ‘Either or Survivor’ and one of the depositors expires before the maturity, no pre-payment of the fixed/term deposit may be allowed without the concurrence of the legal heirs of the deceased joint holder. This, however, would not stand in the way of making payment to the survivor on maturity. 3. In case the mandate is ‘Former or Survivor’, the ‘Former’ alone can operate/withdraw the matured amount of the fixed/term deposit, when both the depositors are alive. However, the signature of both the depositors may have to be obtained, in case the deposit is to be paid before maturity. If the former expires before the maturity of the fixed/term deposit, the ‘Survivor’ can withdraw the deposit on maturity. Premature withdrawal would however require the consent of both the parties, when both of them are alive, and that of the surviving depositor and the legal heirs of the deceased in case of death of one of the depositors. 4. If the joint depositors prefer to allow premature withdrawals of fixed/term deposits also in accordance with the mandate of ‘Either or Survivor’ or ‘Former or Survivor’, as the case may be, it would be open to banks to do so, provided they have taken a specific joint mandate from the depositors for the said purpose. Yours faithfully, (Deepak Singhal) Chief General Manager-In-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/248 · issued 04 Nov 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6798&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗