HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/261

UCBs: Repayment Rules for Joint Fixed/Term Deposits

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/261 · issued 17 Nov 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI clarifies that for joint fixed/term deposits with 'Either or Survivor' mandate, banks must not insist on both depositors' signatures for maturity payment. Premature withdrawals still require both signatures unless a specific joint mandate allows otherwise.

What changed

RBI observed that some banks were requiring both depositors' signatures for maturity repayment of joint fixed/term deposits even when the account had 'Either or Survivor' or 'Former or Survivor' instructions. This circular reiterates that such practice makes the depositor mandate redundant and causes customer service issues. It clarifies the correct procedure for maturity and premature withdrawals under these mandates.

What it means for you

Banks must honor the operating instructions given by joint depositors for fixed/term deposits. For 'Either or Survivor' accounts, only one signature is needed at maturity; for 'Former or Survivor', only the former's signature is needed. Premature withdrawals still require both signatures unless a specific joint mandate is obtained. This reduces unnecessary delays and improves customer service for UCBs.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks, Joint fixed/term deposit account holders, Branch operations staff handling deposit payouts

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Can a survivor withdraw a fixed deposit on maturity if the other joint holder dies before maturity under 'Either or Survivor'?

Yes, the survivor can withdraw the deposit on maturity without needing concurrence from legal heirs. However, premature withdrawal after death of one holder requires consent of the survivor and legal heirs of the deceased.

What if joint depositors want premature withdrawals also under 'Either or Survivor' mandate?

Banks can allow this if they have obtained a specific joint mandate from the depositors authorizing premature withdrawals under the same operating instructions. Without such a mandate, both signatures are needed for premature withdrawal.

Does this circular apply to all types of deposits?

It specifically addresses fixed/term deposits in Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks. The principles may be relevant for other deposit types with similar operating instructions, but the circular is limited to term/fixed deposits.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1413: UBD.BPD.(PCB).CIR.No.11/13.01.000/2011-12 — "Repayment of Term / Fixed Deposits in Banks" dated November 17, 2011”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/261 UBD.BPD.(PCB)CIR No. 11/13.01.000/2011-12 November   17, 2011 The Chief Executive Officers All Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks Dear Sir, Repayment of Term/Fixed Deposits in banks It has come to our notice that some banks insist on the signatures of both the depositors to allow repayment of money in fixed/term deposits, though the deposit account is opened with operating instructions (sometimes called ‘repayment instructions’), ‘Either or Survivor’ or ‘Former or Survivor’. Such insistence on the signatures of both the depositors has the effect of making the mandate given by the depositors redundant. This, in turn, results in unjustified delays and allegations of poor customer service. 2. In this connection, it is clarified that if fixed/term deposit accounts are opened with operating instructions ‘Either or Survivor’, the signatures of both the depositors need not be obtained for payment of the amount of the deposits on maturity. However, the signatures of both the depositors may have to be obtained, in case the deposit is to be paid before maturity. If the operating instruction is ‘Either or Survivor’ and one of the depositors expires before the maturity, no pre-payment of the fixed/term deposit may be allowed without the concurrence of the legal heirs of the deceased joint holder. This, however, would not stand in the way of making payment to the survivor on maturity. 3. In case the mandate is ‘Former or Survivor’, the ‘Former’ alone can operate/withdraw the matured amount of the fixed/term deposit, when both the depositors are alive. However, the signature of both the depositors may have to be obtained, in case the deposit is to be paid before maturity. If the former expires before the maturity of the fixed/term deposit, the ‘Survivor’ can withdraw the deposit on maturity. Premature withdrawal would however require the consent of both the parties, when both of them are alive, and that of the surviving depositor and the legal heirs of the deceased in case of death of one of the depositors. 4. If the joint depositors prefer to allow premature withdrawals of fixed/term deposits also in accordance with the mandate of ‘Either or Survivor’ or ‘Former or Survivor’, as the case may be, it would be open to banks to do so, provided they have taken a specific joint mandate from the depositors for the said purpose. Yours faithfully, (A.Udgata) Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/261 · issued 17 Nov 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6820&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗