HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/321

RBI Tightens Risk Weights on Bank Investments in Exempted Financial Entities

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/321 · issued 27 Dec 2011 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has removed the 100% risk weight exemption for bank investments in paid-up equity of financial entities previously exempt from capital market exposure. From January 1, 2012, these investments will attract a 125% risk weight or higher based on external ratings, aligning them with standard CME norms.

What changed

Previously, investments in paid-up equity of financial entities exempted from capital market exposure (CME) were assigned a 100% risk weight. RBI has now decided that risk weight and capital requirement should be based on risk characteristics, not exemption status. Hence, such investments will now attract a 125% risk weight or the risk weight warranted by external rating (or lack thereof), whichever is higher, as per paragraph 5.13.4 of the Master Circular.

What it means for you

Banks will need to hold more capital against these investments, increasing capital charges. For banking book investments, the capital charge becomes 11.25% of gross equity position; for trading book, it rises to 20.25% or higher (specific risk 11.25% plus general market risk 9%). This aligns treatment with other capital market exposures and removes a regulatory arbitrage.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs and LABs), Treasury and risk management departments, Bank investment portfolios holding equity of financial entities

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What entities are affected by this change?

This applies to banks' investments in paid-up equity of financial entities that were previously exempt from capital market exposure (CME) norms, such as certain financial institutions.

When does this new rule take effect?

The instruction is applicable from January 1, 2012, as stated in the circular.

How does this impact capital charge for trading book investments?

For trading book, the capital charge is 20.25% or higher: 11.25% for specific risk (or higher based on rating) plus 9% for general market risk on gross equity position.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1388: DBOD.No.BP.BC.69/21.06.001/2011-12 — "Capital Requirement for Banks' Investments in Financial Entities exempted from Capital Market Exposure" dated December 2”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/321 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 69 /21.06.001/2011-12 December 27, 2011 The Chairman and Managing Directors/ Chief Executive Officers of All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding RRBs and LABs) Dear Sir, Capital Requirement for banks’ investments in financial entities exempted from Capital Market Exposure Please refer to paragraph 5.13.4 of our Master Circular No. DBOD.No.BP.BC.11/ 21.06.001/2010-11 dated July 1, 2011 on Prudential Guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF), as per which capital market exposure will attract a 125 percent risk weight or risk weight warranted by external rating (or lack of it) of the counterparty, whichever is higher. However, in terms of paragraph 5.13.7 of the said circular, the investment in paid up equity of financial entities, which are specifically exempted from 'capital market exposure' (CME), shall be assigned a 100 percent risk weight. 2. The matter has been reviewed and it has been decided that the risk weight and capital requirement should be linked to risk characteristics of the investment, irrespective of whether they are exempted from CME or not. Therefore, banks’ investments in paid up equity of financial entities, even if they are exempted from CME norms, will henceforth be assigned a 125 percent risk weight or risk weight warranted by external rating (or lack of it) of the counterparty, whichever is higher, as prescribed in paragraph 5.13.4 of the above mentioned circular. 3. Accordingly, banks’ capital market investments in banking book, including those exempted from CME norms, will attract risk weight of 125 percent (i.e. 11.25 percent of capital charge on gross equity position) or as per the risk weight warranted by external rating (or lack of it) of the counterparty, whichever is higher. However, if such investments are in trading book, they will attract capital charge of 20.25 percent or higher [i.e. capital charge towards specific risk at 11.25 percent or as per the risk weight warranted by external rating (or lack of it) of the counterparty, whichever is higher and general market risk at 9 percent of gross equity position]. 4. This instruction will be applicable from January 1, 2012. Yours faithfully, (Deepak Singhal) Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/321 · issued 27 Dec 2011. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6902&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗