Home › Circulars › RBI/2011-12/383

RBI Tightens Housing Loan LTV: Exclude Stamp Duty & Registration Costs

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/383 · issued 03 Feb 2012 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI directs banks to exclude stamp duty, registration, and documentation charges from property cost when calculating Loan-to-Value ratio for housing loans, ensuring LTV norms are not diluted.

What changed

Previously, banks had varying practices—some included non-realisable charges like stamp duty and registration in property cost, inflating the value and weakening LTV compliance. Now, RBI explicitly prohibits including these charges, so LTV must be computed only on the realisable property value.

What it means for you

For banks, this tightens LTV compliance, reducing leveraged lending and improving asset quality. Lenders must recalibrate loan sanction processes to exclude these costs, potentially lowering maximum loan amounts for borrowers. It also aligns with RBI's goal to prevent excessive leveraging in housing finance.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All commercial banks (excluding RRBs) offering housing loans, Housing loan borrowers seeking loans above and below Rs. 20 lakh, Credit risk and compliance teams at banks

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Does this circular change the existing LTV caps of 80% and 90%?

No, the LTV caps remain unchanged: 80% for loans above Rs. 20 lakh and 90% for loans below Rs. 20 lakh. The circular only clarifies that stamp duty, registration, and documentation charges must be excluded from the property cost when applying these caps.

Why did RBI issue this clarification?

RBI observed that banks were inconsistently including non-realisable charges like stamp duty in property cost, which overstated the property's realisable value and diluted the intended margin. This circular ensures uniform and effective LTV compliance across banks.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1377: DBOD.No.BP.BC.78/08.12.001/2011-12 — "Housing Loans by Commercial Banks - Loan to Value (LTV) Ratio" dated February 3, 2012”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/383 DBOD.No.BP.BC. 78 /08.12.001/2011-12 February 03, 2012 The Chairmen and Managing Directors / Chief Executive Officers of All Commercial Banks (Excluding Regional Rural Banks) Dear Sir/ Madam Housing Loans by Commercial Banks – Loan to Value (LTV) Ratio Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.69/08.12.001/2010-11 dated December 23, 2010 on “Housing loans by commercial banks – LTV ratio, risk weight and provisioning” wherein it was advised that in order to prevent excessive leveraging, the LTV ratio in respect of housing loans should not exceed 80 per cent. However, for small value housing loans i.e. for loans below Rs. 20 lakh (which are classified as priority sector advances) the LTV ratio should not exceed 90 per cent. 2. In this connection, it has been brought to our notice that banks adopt different practices for deciding the value of the house property while sanctioning housing loans. Some banks include stamp duty, registration and other documentation charges in the cost of the house property. This overstates the realisable value of the property as stamp duty, registration and other documentation charges are not realisable and consequently the margin stipulated gets diluted. Accordingly, banks should not include these charges in the cost of the housing property they finance so that the effectiveness of LTV norms is not diluted. Yours faithfully, (Deepak Singhal) Chief General Manager-in –Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/383 · issued 03 Feb 2012. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Most relevant forCredit Manager / UnderwritingLoan Operations / CPC / DisbursementCompliance TeamProduct Manager (Digital & Lending)RM — Loans (Assets)Branch Manager — PSU / Co-op / RRB (sanctioning powers)
🛠 Banker’s toolkit — checklists & reply templates →
Related circulars · Department of Regulation
SFB Pillar 3 Disclosure Norms Aligned with BaselUCB Deposit Rate Disclosure & Uniformity Rules UpdatedLAB Deposit Rate Disclosure & Uniformity Rules TightenedPayments Banks: Interest Rates Must Match Disclosed ScheduleRBI Updates Bulk Deposit Rate Rules and Disclosure Timing
Browse all departments →

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=6984&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
—