HomeCirculars › RBI/2011-12/401

RBI Reiterates Mandatory Invitation of MPs/MLAs to DLRC Meetings

Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/401 · issued 17 Feb 2012 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI has reiterated that lead banks must fix DLRC meeting dates in consultation with MPs/MLAs, invite them to all district-level functions, and respond to their queries promptly. Non-compliance was flagged by a Lok Sabha House Committee.
The rule, in the simplest words
How it plays out — a real example

A branch operations officer in Indore, Priya, is planning the next DLRC meeting. She calls the local MP's office to check if the MP is free on the proposed date, avoiding Parliament session weeks. She also sends a personal invitation to the MP and the Zilla Panchayat chief for the upcoming Kisan Credit Card distribution event at the village branch. When the MP's assistant emails a query about loan delays in a nearby block, Priya drops everything to reply within the same day, knowing the RBI expects prompt responses to public representatives.

What changed

A Lok Sabha House Committee observed that lead banks were not arranging DLRC meetings in consultation with MPs. RBI has now reiterated existing instructions, emphasizing that banks must fix meeting dates considering public representatives' convenience, invite them to all bank functions in the district, and prioritize responses to their queries.

What it means for you

Banks must now proactively coordinate with MPs/MLAs for scheduling DLRC meetings, avoiding Parliament session dates. Failure to do so could attract scrutiny from parliamentary committees. This reinforces the role of public representatives in monitoring district credit plans and financial inclusion efforts.

What you must do

Who it affects

Lead banks in all districts, District Level Review Committees (DLRCs), MPs, MLAs, and Zilla Panchayat chiefs

❓ Common questions

What triggered this circular from RBI?

A Lok Sabha House Committee visit revealed that lead banks were not arranging DLRC meetings in consultation with MPs, prompting RBI to reiterate existing instructions.

What specific actions must lead banks take regarding public representatives?

Banks must fix DLRC meeting dates considering MPs/MLAs' convenience, avoid Parliament session dates, invite them to all district functions, and respond to their queries promptly.

Does this circular introduce new rules or just reiterate old ones?

It reiterates and reinforces existing instructions from earlier circulars dating back to 1989, with added emphasis due to observed non-compliance.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2011-12/401 RPCD.CO. LBS. BC.No. 60/02.01.01/2011-12 February 17, 2012 The Chairmen/Managing Directors (All Lead Banks) Dear Sir/Madam, Lead Bank Scheme – Participation of Public Representatives like MPs/MLAs/Zilla Panchayat Chiefs in District Level Review Committees (DLRC) Kindly refer to circular letter RPCD.CO.LBS.BC.No. 6855/02.01.01/2006-07 dated January 22, 2007 wherein Lead banks were requested to ensure the presence of MPs/MLAs in DLRC meetings as far as possible. Reference is also invited to circular RPCD.LBS.BC.85/02.01.01/2000-01 dated May 9, 2001 wherein the Lead banks were advised to adhere to instructions on participation of Members of Parliament and Public Representatives while convening the DLRC meeting. 2.  During the visit of the House Committee of Lok Sabha, it was brought to the Committee's notice that Lead banks were not arranging the DLRC meetings in consultation with MPs. In this regard, we reiterate the extant instructions that Lead banks should fix the date of DLRC meetings with due regard to the convenience of the representatives of the public i.e. MPs/MLAs and invite and involve them in all functions conducted by the banks in the districts, such as opening of new branches, distribution of Kisan Credit cards, SHG credit linkage programmes etc. Further, responses to queries from public representatives need to be accorded highest priority and attended to promptly. 3.   A list of circulars issued in this regard is given in the Annex . Yours faithfully, (Dr. Deepali Pant Joshi) Chief General Manager-in-Charge Encl: Annex ANNEX Sr. No
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2011-12/401 · issued 17 Feb 2012. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Who does what — compliance checklist
🏦 Branch Manager
  • Invite MPs/MLAs and Zilla Panchayat chiefs to all district-level bank functions, including branch openings, KCC distribution, and SHG credit linkage events.
⚙️ Operations
  • Maintain records of attendance of public representatives at DLRC meetings for monitoring.
📜 Compliance
  • Fix DLRC meeting dates in consultation with MPs/MLAs, avoiding Parliament session periods.
  • Respond to queries from public representatives promptly and with highest priority.
Grouped from the action items above — a single circular may involve more than one team.
Worked example & action-note template

Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (Lead banks in all districts, District Level Review Committees (DLRCs), MPs, MLAs, and Zilla Panchayat chiefs), your first concrete step on “RBI Reiterates Mandatory Invitation of MPs/MLAs to DLRC Meetings” is: “Fix DLRC meeting dates in consultation with MPs/MLAs, avoiding Parliament session periods.” (RBI issued this 17 Feb 2012).

  1. Circular: RBI/2011-12/401 -- RBI Reiterates Mandatory Invitation of MPs/MLAs to DLRC Meetings
  2. Issued: 17 Feb 2012
  3. Action required: Fix DLRC meeting dates in consultation with MPs/MLAs, avoiding Parliament session periods.
  4. Action required: Invite MPs/MLAs and Zilla Panchayat chiefs to all district-level bank functions, including branch openings, KCC distribution, and SHG credit linkage events.
  5. Action required: Respond to queries from public representatives promptly and with highest priority.
  6. Action required: Maintain records of attendance of public representatives at DLRC meetings for monitoring.
  7. Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
  8. Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
  9. Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7010&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗