Revised Disclosure Norms for Restructured Advances
Current · Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2012-13/409 · issued 31 Jan 2013 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI now allows banks to stop disclosing restructured advances that have performed well and no longer attract higher provisions or risk weights. This change applies from FY 2012-13 and aims to reflect true asset quality.
The rule, in the simplest words
Banks no longer have to show loans that were once restructured (changed to help the borrower) but are now performing well and don't need extra safety money (provisions) or higher risk weights (extra caution).
This rule starts from the financial year 2012-13, so banks can show a cleaner picture of their loan quality.
Even if a loan is no longer disclosed as restructured, banks must still keep aside money for any loss in value (diminution in fair value) on that loan.
Banks must still show in their annual reports: total restructured loans (excluding the cured ones), the safety money set aside, and how these loans changed over the year.
How it plays out — a real example
A credit & lending officer in Indore reviews a small business loan that was restructured two years ago. The borrower has paid on time for 18 months, so the loan no longer needs extra provisions or risk weights. The officer updates the annual balance sheet notes to exclude this loan from the restructured list, but keeps the provision for fair value loss as required. This makes the bank's asset quality look healthier to investors.
What changed
Previously, banks had to disclose all restructured advances cumulatively in annual balance sheets, even those that had recovered. Now, standard restructured accounts that have met performance criteria and reverted to normal provisioning/risk weights can be excluded from disclosure. However, the provision for fair value diminution on such accounts must still be maintained.
What it means for you
This reduces the stigma on previously stressed accounts that have normalized, allowing banks to present a cleaner asset quality picture. It also aligns disclosure with actual risk, as accounts that have demonstrated sustained performance are no longer flagged as restructured. Banks must still track and disclose cumulative restructured data excluding these cured accounts, along with provisions and movement details.
What you must do
Update annual balance sheet notes to exclude standard restructured advances that have ceased to attract higher provisions/risk weights from cumulative disclosure.
Continue to maintain provisions for diminution in fair value on such cured restructured accounts as per existing instructions.
Adopt the new disclosure format provided in the Annex for FY 2012-13 onwards, including cumulative restructured data (excluding cured accounts), provisions, and movement details.
Who it affects
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), Bank finance and accounting teams preparing annual disclosures, Risk management and credit monitoring departments
❓ Common questions
Which restructured accounts can we stop disclosing?
Standard restructured advances that have performed satisfactorily during the prescribed period and have reverted to normal provisioning and risk weights can be excluded from cumulative disclosure in the Notes on Accounts.
Do we still need to maintain provisions on these cured accounts?
Yes, the provision for diminution in fair value on such restructured accounts must continue to be maintained as per existing instructions, even if they are no longer disclosed as restructured.
From when is this change effective?
The revised disclosure requirements are effective from the financial year 2012-13.
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2012-13/409
DBOD.BP.BC.No.80/21.04.132/2012-13
January 31, 2013
All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(excluding RRBs)
Dear Sir,
Disclosure Requirements on Advances Restructured by Banks and
Financial Institutions
Please refer to paragraph 16 of Master Circular on Prudential norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning pertaining to Advances dated July 2, 2012 in terms of which banks should disclose in their published Annual Balance Sheets, under "Notes on Accounts", information relating to number and amount of advances restructured, and the amount of diminution in the fair value of the restructured advances under the following categories:
Standard Advances Restructured;
Sub-Standard Advances Restructured; and
Doubtful Advances Restructured.
Under each of the category above, advances restructured under CDR Mechanism, SME Debt Restructuring Mechanism and other categories of restructuring are required to be shown separately.
2. The Working Group (WG) constituted by RBI to Review the existing Prudential Guidelines on Restructuring of Advances (Chairman: Shri B. Mahapatra) had recommended that once the higher provisions and risk weights (if applicable) on restructured advances (classified as standard either abinitio or on upgradation from NPA category) revert back to the normal level on account of satisfactory performance during the prescribed period, such advances should no longer be required to be disclosed by banks as restructured accounts in the “Notes on Accounts” in their Annual Balance Sheets. However, the provision for diminution in the fair value of restructured accounts on such restructured accounts should continue to be maintained by banks as per the existing instructions. The WG also recommended that banks may be required to disclose:
details of accounts restructured on a cumulative basis excluding the standard restructured accounts which cease to attract higher provision and risk weight (if applicable);
provisions made on restructured accounts under various categories; and
details of movement of restructured accounts.
3. This recommendation has been accepted in view of the fact that in terms of present guidelines, banks are required to disclose annually all accounts restructured in their books on a cumulative basis even though many of them would have subsequently shown satisfactory performance over a sufficiently long period. As such the present position of disclosures do not take into account the fact that in many of these accounts the inherent weaknesses have disappeared and the accounts are in fact standard in all respects, but continue to be disclosed as restructured advances.
4. Accordingly, banks should henceforth disclose in their published Annual Balance Sheets, under "Notes on Accounts", information relating to number and amount of advances restructured, and the amount of diminution in the fair value of the restructured advances as per the format given in the Annex. Detailed instructions relating to the disclosure are also given in the Annex .
5. The above disclosure requirements will be effective from the financial year 2012-13.
Yours faithfully
(Deepak Singhal)
Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Encls: as above
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2012-13/409 · issued 31 Jan 2013. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Example: if you are a Compliance officer at a bank this circular applies to (All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs), Bank finance and accounting teams preparing annual disclosures, Risk management and credit monitoring departments), your first concrete step on “Revised Disclosure Norms for Restructured Advances” is: “Update annual balance sheet notes to exclude standard restructured advances that have ceased to attract higher provisions/risk weights from cumulative disclosure.” (RBI issued this 31 Jan 2013).
Circular: RBI/2012-13/409 -- Revised Disclosure Norms for Restructured Advances
Issued: 31 Jan 2013
Action required: Update annual balance sheet notes to exclude standard restructured advances that have ceased to attract higher provisions/risk weights from cumulative disclosure.
Action required: Continue to maintain provisions for diminution in fair value on such cured restructured accounts as per existing instructions.
Action required: Adopt the new disclosure format provided in the Annex for FY 2012-13 onwards, including cumulative restructured data (excluding cured accounts), provisions, and movement details.
Owner: ____________ Target date: ____________
Board/committee approval needed? Y / N
Evidence filed in compliance register on: ____________
Built only from this circular’s own published fields — not legal advice; always confirm against the official RBI source.
💬 Banker Discussion
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7845&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.