HomeCirculars › RBI/2012-13/467

RBI Clarifies CCF for Bank Guarantees Under NCAF

Live · in forceNo withdrawal recorded as of 20 Jun 2026. Reviewed by Vikram Jain; always verify against the official RBI source below.
Issued by RBI: 02 Apr 2013  ·  Decoded by BankPulse: 19 Jun 2026, 21:34 IST
⏱ ~2 min read
📄 Official RBI source ↗
Quick answerRBI has clarified that financial guarantees (e.g., credit facilities, tax dues) must use 100% CCF, while performance guarantees (e.g., bid bonds, EMD) use 50% CCF under NCAF, to correct widespread misapplication.

What changed

RBI observed large disparities in how banks apply credit conversion factors (CCF) to guarantees. It issued a detailed indicative list to distinguish financial guarantees (100% CCF) from performance guarantees (50% CCF), replacing earlier ambiguity.

What it means for you

Banks must now strictly classify guarantees as financial or performance based on the nature of risk, not just the label. Misclassification directly impacts capital adequacy calculations, so lenders need to review their guarantee portfolios and ensure correct CCF application to avoid capital shortfalls.

What you must do

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding LABs and RRBs), Credit risk management teams, Treasury and capital planning departments, Audit and compliance functions

What is the key difference between a financial guarantee and a performance guarantee?

A financial guarantee is a direct credit substitute where the bank guarantees repayment of a financial obligation, carrying credit risk similar to a loan. A performance guarantee covers non-financial contractual obligations, where loss depends on an event, not just counterparty creditworthiness.

Does this circular change the CCF percentages?

No, the CCF percentages remain 100% for financial guarantees and 50% for performance guarantees. The circular only clarifies the classification to ensure consistent application across banks.

What happens if a bank misclassifies a guarantee?

Incorrect CCF application directly affects capital adequacy calculations, potentially leading to understated risk-weighted assets and capital shortfall. Banks must correct classifications and may need to adjust capital planning.

Track this rule
⏳ How this rule evolved — History Map →Full RBI rulebook crosswalk →
AI-drafted · 3-model AI consensus fact-check · under the editorial review of Vikram Jain · decoded & published by BankPulse · 19 Jun 2026, 21:34 IST
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7924&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by Vikram Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; never reproduces RBI text verbatim.