HomeCirculars › RBI/2013-14/217

RBI Bans Upfront Disbursal of Housing Loans for Under-Construction Projects

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/217 · issued 03 Sep 2013 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has prohibited banks from making upfront lump-sum disbursal of housing loans for incomplete or greenfield projects. Disbursals must now be linked to construction stages to curb risks like fund diversion and borrower credit score damage.

What changed

RBI observed banks offering innovative housing loan schemes (e.g., 80:20, 75:25) where sanctioned loans were disbursed upfront to builders without linking to construction stages. Such products often involved tripartite agreements and builder-serviced EMIs. The circular now mandates that disbursal of housing loans to individuals must be closely tied to the progress of construction, and upfront disbursal is barred for incomplete or greenfield projects.

What it means for you

Banks can no longer offer popular schemes that disburse the full loan amount upfront to builders, which exposes both lenders and borrowers to risks like project delays, fund diversion, and borrower credit rating hits from delayed EMI payments by builders. Lenders must now ensure each disbursement tranche corresponds to a verified stage of construction, reducing exposure to unfinished projects. This may slow loan disbursal cycles but strengthens asset quality and customer protection.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs) offering housing loans, Home loan borrowers availing innovative schemes like 80:20 or 75:25, Developers and builders partnering with banks for such loan products, Credit information companies (CICs) receiving loan repayment data

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What exactly is banned under this circular?

Banks cannot make upfront lump-sum disbursal of sanctioned housing loans to builders for incomplete or greenfield projects. Disbursals must be linked to stages of construction.

Why did RBI issue this directive?

RBI identified higher risks in such products, including fund diversion by builders, disputes between buyers and builders, and borrower credit score damage from delayed EMI payments by builders.

Does this affect existing loans already disbursed upfront?

The circular does not explicitly address past loans, but banks should review existing exposures and ensure future disbursals comply. For ongoing projects, banks may need to adjust disbursement schedules.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #1036: DBOD.BP.BC.No.51/08.12.015/2013-14 — "Housing Sector : Innovative Housing Loan Products - Upfront Disbursal of Housing Loans" dated September 3, 2013”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2013-14/217 DBOD.BP.BC.No. 51/08.12.015/2013-14 September 3, 2013 All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir, Housing Sector: Innovative Housing Loan Products – Upfront disbursal of housing loans It has been observed that some banks have introduced certain innovative Housing Loan Schemes in association with developers/builders, e.g. upfront disbursal of sanctioned individual housing loans to the builders without linking the disbursals to various stages of construction of housing project, interest/EMI on the housing loan availed of by the individual borrower being serviced by the builders during the construction period/specified period, etc. This might include signing of tripartite agreements between the bank, the builder and the buyer of the housing unit. These loan products are popularly known by various names like 80:20, 75:25 Schemes. 2. Such housing loan products are likely to expose the banks as well as their home loan borrowers to additional risks e.g. in case of disputes between individual borrowers and developers/builders, default/delayed payment of interest/EMI by the developer/builder during the agreed period on behalf of the borrower, non-completion of the project on time, etc. Further, any delayed payments by developers/builders on behalf of individual borrowers to banks may lead to lower credit rating/scoring of such borrowers by credit information companies (CICs) as information about servicing of loans gets passed on to the CICs on a regular basis. In cases where bank loans are also disbursed upfront on behalf of their individual borrowers in a lump-sum to builders/developers without any linkage to stages of construction, banks run disproportionately higher exposures with concomitant risks of diversion of funds. 3. In view of the higher risks associated with such lump-sum disbursal of sanctioned housing loans and customer suitability issues, banks are advised that disbursal of housing loans sanctioned to individuals should be closely linked to the stages of construction of the housing project/houses and upfront disbursal should not be made in cases of incomplete/under-construction/green field housing projects. 4. It is emphasized that banks while introducing any kind of product should take into account the customer suitability and appropriateness issues and also ensure that the borrowers/customers are made fully aware of the risks and liabilities under such products. Yours faithfully (Rajesh Verma) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/217 · issued 03 Sep 2013. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=8366&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗