HomeCirculars › RBI/2013-14/485

RBI Allows Use of 33% Countercyclical Buffer for NPAs

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/485 · issued 07 Feb 2014 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI permits banks to use up to 33% of their countercyclical provisioning buffer or floating provisions held as of March 31, 2013, to make specific provisions for NPAs, subject to board-approved policy. This is a countercyclical measure to ease provisioning pressure.

What changed

Previously, banks could use the countercyclical provisioning buffer only with prior RBI approval during system-wide downturns. Now, RBI has allowed banks to utilise up to 33% of this buffer (including floating provisions) as of March 31, 2013, for specific NPA provisions, based on board policy. This utilisation is in addition to any use for accelerated/additional provisions under the January 30, 2014 framework for distressed assets.

What it means for you

Banks get immediate relief to cover NPA provisions without hitting current profits, improving reported earnings. This countercyclical move helps banks manage asset quality stress during economic downturns. However, it reduces the buffer available for future shocks, so banks must balance short-term relief with long-term resilience.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding Local Area Banks and Regional Rural Banks), Bank boards and risk management committees, Bank finance and provisioning teams

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Can we use more than 33% of the buffer?

No, the circular specifically limits utilisation to up to 33% of the countercyclical provisioning buffer/floating provisions held as on March 31, 2013. Any additional use would require separate RBI approval.

Does this utilisation affect our ability to use the buffer for accelerated provisions under the January 2014 framework?

No, this utilisation is over and above any use for accelerated/additional provisions under the January 30, 2014 framework for distressed assets. Both can be used independently.

What happens to the remaining buffer after utilisation?

The remaining buffer stays on your books and can be used only as per existing RBI guidelines, which generally require prior RBI approval for use during system-wide downturns.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #945: DBOD.No.BP.95/21.04.048/2013-14 — "Utilisation of Floating Provisions / Counter Cyclical Provisioning Buffer" dated February 7, 2014”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2013-14/485 DBOD.No.BP.95/21.04.048/2013-14 February 7, 2014 The Chairman and Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding Local Area Banks and Regional Rural Banks) Dear Sir, Utilisation of Floating Provisions/Counter Cyclical Provisioning Buffer Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.89/21.04.048/2005-06 dated June 22, 2006 and DBOD.No.BP.BC. 68/21.04.048/2006-07 dated March 13, 2007 on creation, accounting, disclosures and utilisation of floating provisions by banks. Banks may also refer to our circular No.DBOD.No.BP.BC.87/21.04.048/2010-11 dated April 21, 2011 on creation and utilisation of ‘countercyclical provisioning buffer’, wherein we had advised that this buffer will be allowed to be used by banks for making specific provisions for non-performing assets, inter alia, during periods of system wide downturn, with the prior approval of RBI. 2. Accordingly, it has been decided, as a countercyclical measure, that banks may utilise upto 33 per cent of countercyclical provisioning buffer/floating provisions held by them as on March 31, 2013, for making specific provisions for non-performing assets, as per the policy approved by their Board of Directors. 3. Utilisation of countercyclical provisioning buffer/floating provisions under this measure may be over and above the utilisation of countercyclical provisioning buffer/floating provisions for the purpose of making accelerated/additional provisions as proposed in the Reserve Bank’s Press Release dated January 30, 2014 on “ Early Recognition of Financial Distress, Prompt Steps for Resolution and Fair Recovery for Lenders: Framework for Revitalising Distressed Assets in the Economy ”. 4. In this connection, banks may also refer to the Discussion Paper on Introduction of Dynamic Loan Loss Provisioning Framework for Banks in India dated March 30, 2012, wherein banks are required to build up ‘Dynamic Provisioning Account’ during good times and utilise the same during downturn. Under the proposed framework, banks are expected to either compute parameters such as probability of default, loss given default, etc. for different asset classes to arrive at long term average annual expected loss or use the standardised parameters prescribed by Reserve Bank of India towards computation of Dynamic Provisioning requirement. Dynamic loan loss provisioning framework is expected to be in place with improvement in the system. Meanwhile, banks should develop necessary capabilities to compute their long term average annual expected loss for different asset classes, for switching over to the dynamic provisioning framework. Yours faithfully, (Chandan Sinha) Principal Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/485 · issued 07 Feb 2014. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=8737&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗