HomeCirculars › RBI/2013-14/551

RBI Tightens Gold Metal Loan Norms to Curb Frauds

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/551 · issued 02 Apr 2014 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates stricter credit appraisal for Gold Metal Loans (GMLs), requiring both issuing and disbursing banks to independently assess borrowers. Stand-by LC/BG limits must be treated like fund-based limits, and end-use monitoring is non-negotiable to prevent misuse by jewellers.

What changed

RBI observed that banks were extending GMLs relying heavily on stand-by LCs/BGs from other banks without proper credit appraisal, leading to frauds. New guidelines require stand-by LC/BG issuing banks to treat these limits at par with fund-based limits and conduct rigorous credit checks. GML disbursing banks must also do independent appraisals and not rely solely on other banks' guarantees. Both banks must share information and jointly inspect stocks to ensure end-use compliance.

What it means for you

Banks can no longer take a hands-off approach when GMLs are backed by other banks' guarantees; they must independently verify borrower creditworthiness. This increases due diligence costs but reduces fraud risk. Jewellers must be genuine manufacturers, and banks must monitor sales proceeds and stock positions regularly. Non-compliance could lead to regulatory action.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All scheduled commercial banks (excluding RRBs) offering Gold Metal Loans, Banks issuing stand-by LCs or BGs for GMLs, Gold jewellery manufacturers availing GMLs

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Can a bank rely solely on another bank's stand-by LC/BG for a GML?

No. The GML disbursing bank must carry out its own independent credit appraisal of the borrower and not depend only on the stand-by LC/BG issued by another bank.

What happens if a jeweller is not a manufacturer of gold jewellery?

GMLs can only be availed by jewellers who are themselves manufacturers of gold jewellery. Non-manufacturers are not eligible under the scheme.

Do both banks need to inspect the gold stock?

Yes. Inspection of stocks, quality checks, and insurance verification should be done jointly or on a rotation basis by both the GML providing bank and the stand-by LC/BG issuing bank.

📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #934: DBOD.No.IBD.BC.104/23.67.001/2013-14 — "Gold (Metal) Loans (GMLs)" dated April 2, 2014”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2013-14/551 DBOD.No.IBD.BC.104/23.67.001/2013-14 April 2, 2014 All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) Dear Sir / Madam Gold (Metal) Loans (GMLs) Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.IBD.BC.33/23.67.001/2005-06 dated September 5, 2005 and circular DBOD.No.IBD.BC. 71/23.67.001/2006-07 dated April 3, 2007 wherein banks had been advised to ensure the end use of gold loans and also to lay down appropriate risk management and lending policy to obviate the possibility of frauds in this area. 2. It has come to our notice that some GML providing banks are extending Gold Metal Loans mainly relying on stand-by LC/BG issued by other banks, without carrying out detailed credit appraisal. If the sales proceeds are not routed through GML providing banks, they are not able to monitor end use of the gold lent. Further, banks issuing stand-by LC/BG often do not carry out proper credit appraisal of the borrowers. Lack of proper monitoring mechanism and not ensuring end use of GML has resulted in certain instances of frauds/ misuse related to GML by certain unscrupulous jewellers. In order to mitigate the risk of frauds/misuse of the scheme by the GML borrowers, it is advised that the stand-by LC/BG issuing bank and the GML providing banks should keep the following additional guidelines in view: i. Stand-by LC/BG issuing bank should carry out rigorous credit appraisal exercise and treat stand-by LC/BG limit (Non-fund based limit) at par with the fund based limit. Similarly, bank disbursing GML should carry out independent credit appraisal of the borrower. It should not rely solely on stand-by LC/BG issued by other banks. ii. Stand-by LC/BG issuing bank and bank disbursing GML while assessing the credit requirement of the borrower may, among others, take into account the following aspects: Track record of the borrower, Trade cycle of the manufacturing activity, Credit worthiness of the borrower, Collateral security offered by the borrower, etc. iii. The manufacturer of the gold jewellery availing GML, irrespective of whether through stand-by LC/BG issued by another bank or directly from a nominated bank, should have good credentials and standing in the market. This should be established by inputs from the market as well as from other sources including from the Credit Information Companies. iv. In the case of GML against revolving stand-by LC/BG, i.e., where the original loan limit is restored after repayment of previous loan without any further reference to the stand-by LC/BG issuing bank, both the banks, i.e., GML providing bank and the stand-by LC/BG issuing bank may evolve a mechanism to carefully monitor the borrowing arrangement. In such cases GML providing bank may seek confirmation of stand-by LC/BG issuing bank before restoring the loan limit.  Existing guidelines in respect of verifying the genuineness of the guarantee with the issuing bank as provided in the Master Circular on Guarantees and Co-acceptances ( DBOD.No.Dir.BC.12/13.03.00/2013-14 dated July 1, 2013 ) may be followed by the banks in this regard. v. Bank disbursing GML should open current account of the borrower with the consent of stand-by LC/BG issuing bank so that funds can be arranged by the borrower in the account for monthly servicing of interest and repayment of loan on due date. vi. The GML providing bank may obtain all relevant information from the borrower viz., daily sales/stock position, deposit of sales proceeds etc., at stipulated intervals and there should be proper sharing of the above information between GML providing bank and stand-by LC/BG issuing bank. vii. Inspection of stocks, quality check of the gold stock, verification of insurance cover, etc, may be undertaken jointly or on rotation basis by the GML providing bank and stand-by LC/BG issuing bank. viii. In case GML is given by the nominated bank to its own existing customers, gold metal loans under the scheme may be carved out within the credit limit sanctioned by the bank. In case of new borrowers, the gold metal loan limit may be fixed after carrying out a detailed credit appraisal and due diligence. ix. GML can be availed of only by gold jewellers who are themselves manufacturers of gold jewellery. The jewellers cannot sell the gold borrowed under GML scheme to any other party for manufacture of jewellery. 3. Banks may adopt a suitable Board approved policy in this regard keeping in view the above guidelines and the regulations issued by the Foreign Exchange Department, of the RBI related to import of gold. 4. These instructions will come into force with immediate effect. Yours faithfully (Rajesh Verma) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2013-14/551 · issued 02 Apr 2014. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=8823&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗