Home › Circulars › RBI/2021-22/38

Sponsor Contribution to Overseas AIFs Treated as ODI

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2021-22/38 · issued 12 May 2021 · ~1 min read
Quick answerRBI now treats sponsor contributions by Indian parties to overseas AIFs (including IFSCs) as Overseas Direct Investment under automatic route, subject to FEMA 120/2004-RB Regulation 7 compliance.

What changed

Previously, sponsor contributions to overseas AIFs were not explicitly classified as ODI. Now, any such contribution by an Indian party sponsor to an AIF set up abroad or in an IFSC will be treated as ODI under the automatic route, provided it meets Regulation 7 of FEMA 120/2004-RB.

What it means for you

Banks must now process these sponsor contributions as ODI, requiring adherence to existing ODI reporting and compliance norms. This brings clarity and a streamlined automatic route for Indian sponsors investing in overseas AIFs, including those in IFSCs, reducing ambiguity.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

Indian parties (sponsors) investing in overseas AIFs, AD Category-I banks handling ODI transactions, AIFs set up in overseas jurisdictions including IFSCs

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

Does this circular apply to AIFs set up in IFSCs within India?

Yes, the circular explicitly includes AIFs set up in International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs) in India.

What is the key compliance requirement for such investments?

The Indian party must comply with Regulation 7 of FEMA 120/2004-RB, which governs investments in financial services sector entities.

Will existing ODI reporting procedures change?

No, the circular states that all other provisions under the notification remain unchanged, so existing ODI reporting procedures apply.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2021-22/38 A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 04 May 12, 2021 To All Category-I Authorised Dealer Banks Madam/ Sir Sponsor Contribution to an AIF set up in Overseas Jurisdiction, including IFSCs Attention of AD Category - I banks is invited to paragraph A.3.(e) and B.6 of Master Direction No.15 dated January 1, 2016 , on “Direct Investment by Residents in Joint Venture (JV) / Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) Abroad”, as amended from time to time and Regulation 7 of the Notification FEMA 120/2004-RB , pertaining to provisions for an Indian Party (IP) making investment/ financial commitment in an entity engaged in the financial services sector. 2. It has been decided that any sponsor contribution from a sponsor IP to an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) set up in an overseas jurisdiction, including International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs) in India, as per the laws of the host jurisdiction, will be treated as Overseas Direct Investment (ODI). Accordingly, IP, as defined in regulation 2(k) of the Notification ibid. can set up AIF in overseas jurisdictions, including IFSCs, under the automatic route provided it complies with Regulation 7 of the Notification FEMA 120/2004-RB . 3. All the other provisions under the Notification ibid. shall remain unchanged. AD Category - I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned. 4. The Master Direction No. 15 dated January 01, 2016 , is being updated to reflect the changes. 5. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under section 10 (4) and 11(1) of the FEMA and are without prejudice to permissions/approvals, if any, required under any other law. Yours faithfully Ajay Kumar Misra Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2021-22/38 · issued 12 May 2021. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Most relevant forCompliance TeamCorporate / Wholesale Banking RMTrade Finance / Forex OperationsNRI Relationship ManagerRM — Deposits & Wealth (CASA / HNI)Senior Management / Board
🛠 Banker’s toolkit — checklists & reply templates →
Related circulars · Foreign Exchange (FEMA)
RBI raises cash carry limit for travellers to Rs 7,500Rupee Value of Special Currency Basket Revised to Rs.60.897378ECB Policy Liberalised: Cost Ceilings Removed, NBFCs & Realty Get BoostECB: Integrated Township Exemption Removed, Cost Ceilings TightenedRBI Delegates Bank Guarantee Powers for Foreign Airlines to AD Banks
Browse all departments →

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=12092&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
—