Risk Weight Rules Tightened for Unrated Corporate & NBFC Exposures
No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2022-23/125 · issued 10 Oct 2022 · ~2 min read
Quick answerFrom March 31, 2023, banks cannot use a loan rating for capital computation unless the ECAI's press release names the bank and facility. Without that disclosure, the exposure must be treated as unrated, attracting applicable risk weights (100% or 150% as per extant instructions).
What changed
RBI observed that ECAI press releases on rating actions often omit lender details, creating information asymmetry. Despite a June 2021 advisory to disclose bank names and facilities, compliance remained poor. Now, any bank loan rating not accompanied by such disclosure in the ECAI press release is ineligible for capital computation; banks must treat the exposure as unrated.
What it means for you
Banks can no longer rely on a borrower's external rating for capital relief unless the ECAI explicitly names the bank and the specific facility rated. This forces banks to either secure borrower consent for disclosure or assign higher risk weights (100% or 150%) to such exposures, increasing capital requirements. It tightens the link between rating transparency and capital adequacy, reducing the risk of underpricing.
Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.
What banks were required to do at the time
Review all existing loan ratings used for capital computation and verify that the ECAI's press release discloses your bank's name and the rated facility.
For new ratings, include a clause in loan agreements requiring borrower consent for ECAI disclosure of bank and facility details.
Update internal risk-weighting systems to flag any exposure where the ECAI press release lacks required disclosure, and apply unrated risk weights from March 31, 2023.
Train credit and risk teams on the new rule, especially for syndicated or multiple-bank exposures where only one facility is rated.
Who it affects
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (including Small Finance Banks), Credit risk and capital management teams, Banks with unrated exposures relying on derived risk weights from rated debt of the same borrower
❓ Common questions
Regulatory timeline
Decoded by BankPulse2026-06-18 05:31 IST
repealed_by — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
Status change: withdrawn03 Aug 2026, 04:00 IST
Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).
What happens if an ECAI press release does not name my bank but names another lender's facility?
You cannot use that rating for capital computation. Your exposure must be treated as unrated, and you must assign the applicable risk weight (100% or 150%) as per extant instructions.
Can we still derive risk weights for our unrated facility if the ECAI discloses the rated facility of another bank?
Yes, but only if the ECAI press release discloses the name of the bank and the specific facility rated. If that disclosure is made, the other banks can derive risk weights subject to conditions in paragraph 6.8.1(i) of the Master Circular. If no disclosure, no bank can use the rating.
When does this rule take effect?
The instructions are effective from March 31, 2023. You should ensure compliance by that date for all existing and new ratings.
📜 This document’s life story (1 recorded event, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Repealed byRBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #215: DOR.STR.REC.71/21.06.201/2022-23 — "Review of Prudential Norms - Risk Weights for Exposures to Corporates and NBFCs" dated October 10, 2022”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2022-23/125
DOR.STR.REC.71/21.06.201/2022-23
October 10, 2022
All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(including Small Finance Banks)
(Excluding Local Area Banks, Regional Rural Banks and Payments Banks)
Madam/Dear Sir,
Review of Prudential Norms – Risk Weights for Exposures to Corporates and NBFCs
Please refer to paragraph 6.8.1 (i) of Master Circular on Basel III capital regulations dated April 1, 2022 in terms of which banks are permitted to derive risk weights for their unrated exposures based on the ratings available for a specific rated debt subject to the conditions specified that the bank’s facility ranks pari passu or senior to the specific rated debt in all respects and the maturity of the unassessed claim is not later than the maturity of the rated claim. Banks may also refer to paragraph 6.2.5 of the Master Circular ibid regarding publication of bank loan ratings by External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs).
2. It is observed that the Press Releases (PRs) issued by ECAIs on rating actions are often devoid of the lenders’ details. Absence of such information may result in banks applying the derived risk weights for unrated exposures, without satisfying themselves regarding adherence to prescribed conditions. This may, consequentially, lead to potentially lower provision of capital as well as underpricing of risks. In order to address the above information asymmetry, the Reserve Bank had advised the ECAIs vide letter dated June 4, 2021 to disclose the name of the banks and the corresponding credit facilities rated by them in the PRs issued on rating actions by August 31, 2021, after obtaining requisite consent from the borrowers.
3. However, on a review it has been observed that the above disclosures are not available in a large number of PRs issued by ECAIs owing to the absence of requisite consent by the borrowers to the ECAIs. It is, therefore, advised that a bank loan rating without the above disclosure by the ECAI shall not be eligible for being reckoned for capital computation by banks. Banks shall treat such exposures as unrated and assign applicable risk weights in terms of paragraph 5.8.1 of the Master Circular ibid read with amendments carried out from time to time.
4. Illustratively, a scenario may be assumed, where a borrower has availed credit facilities from Banks A, B and C and external rating from an ECAI is obtained only in respect of the credit facility extended by Bank A. If the ECAI has disclosed the name of Bank A and the corresponding credit facility rated by it, then Bank A can reckon the said rating for risk weighting purpose. Banks B and C are permitted to derive risk weights for their respective unrated credit facilities subject to conditions stated in paragraph 6.8.1 (i) of Master Circular ibid, as permitted hitherto. In the event of ECAI not making the above disclosure, none of the banks shall reckon the said rating, and therefore shall apply risk weights of 100 percent or 150 percent as applicable in terms of extant instructions.
5. The above instructions shall be effective from March 31, 2023.
Yours faithfully,
(Manoranjan Mishra)
Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2022-23/125 · issued 10 Oct 2022. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly). Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=12396&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Help us keep this accurate
Found an inaccuracy or have an improvement? Tell us. Every report is reviewed by our team before any change is made — nothing goes live unverified.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗
BANKPULSE · FREE DAILY BRIEF
Get RBI updates for your role
Every important RBI update, decoded in plain English — for your career, exams & financial awareness.
We collect only your email, name and role, used solely to send your brief — never sold or shared. Withdraw anytime via the unsubscribe link in any email. Independent platform, not affiliated with the RBI. Information, not legal advice.
REPORT AN ERROR · BETA
Spotted an error? Earn 500 BankPulse Credits
Help us stay accurate. If your correction is verified true and approved by our founder, you earn 500 BankPulse Credits — redeemable when the platform monetises.
Reviewed by a human before any credit is awarded. We never change the site from crowd input without verification.
WANT A NEW FEATURE · BETA
What would make BankPulse more useful for you?
Tell us what to build next — a tool, a data view, a role page, anything. We read every suggestion.
Thank you — your ideas directly shape what we build.