HomeCirculars › RBI/2005-06/338

RBI Liberalises Overseas Investment Rules for Indian Corporates

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/338 · issued 27 Mar 2006 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI has expanded automatic route for guarantees (corporate, personal, collateral) by Indian entities for overseas JVs/WOSs, eased disinvestment norms for listed overseas JV/WOS, listed Indian promoter companies with networth ≥₹100 crore, and unlisted promoters with investment ≤USD 10 million, and allowed proprietary/unregistered partnership firms (star exporters) to invest abroad with prior RBI approval.

What changed

Guarantees: Previously only promoter corporates could issue guarantees under automatic route; now any Indian entity can offer any form of guarantee (corporate, personal, collateral, group company) provided total financial commitments (including guarantees) stay within 200% of the investing company's networth and guarantee amount is specified upfront. Disinvestment: Automatic route now covers listed overseas JV/WOS, Indian listed promoter companies with networth ≥₹100 crore, and unlisted Indian promoters with investment ≤USD 10 million; prior RBI approval no longer needed for these cases. Proprietorship firms: Star exporters (proprietary/unregistered partnership firms) can now apply for overseas investment with prior RBI approval, subject to eligibility criteria.

What it means for you

Banks must update their internal processes to handle a wider range of guarantee structures under automatic route, ensuring clients' total financial commitments (including guarantees) stay within the 200% networth ceiling. For disinvestment, banks need to verify eligibility (e.g., networth, listing status) and report details within 30 days. Proprietorship/unregistered firm proposals require careful due diligence and forwarding to RBI with bank recommendations.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

Authorised Dealer (AD) banks handling foreign exchange, Indian corporates with overseas JVs/WOSs, Proprietary/unregistered partnership firms (star exporters), Compliance and trade finance departments of banks

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What types of guarantees are now allowed under automatic route?

Indian entities can now offer corporate, personal, collateral, promoter, group company, sister concern, or associate company guarantees, provided total financial commitments (including guarantees) stay within 200% of the investing company's networth and the guarantee amount is specified upfront.

When is prior RBI approval still needed for disinvestment?

Prior approval is no longer needed for disinvestment of listed overseas JV/WOS, or if the Indian promoter company is listed with networth ≥₹100 crore, or unlisted promoter with investment ≤USD 10 million. Other cases still require RBI approval.

Can proprietary firms now invest abroad without RBI approval?

No, they need prior RBI approval. Only star exporters (proprietary/unregistered partnership firms) meeting eligibility criteria can apply through their AD bank, which forwards the proposal to RBI.

📜 This document’s life story (2 recorded events, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Partially modified by RBI eases ODI norms: performance guarantees & write-offs
RBI’s words: “In partial modification of the above, it has now been decided to include listed Indian promoter companies”
Consolidated into Overseas Direct Investment: Liberalisation and Rationalisation
RBI’s words: “the existing guidelines are consolidated as indicated below”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2005-06/338 A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 29 March 27, 2006 To, All Banks Authorised to Deal in Foreign Exchange Madam /Sir, Overseas Investment - Liberalisation Attention of Authorised Dealer (AD) Banks is invited to Notification No. FEMA120/RB-2004 dated 7th July 2004 , as amended, from time to time. With a view to grant more operational flexibility to the corporates in India it has been decided to further liberalise the various Regulations as under: 2. Guarantees Presently, only promoter corporates are permitted to offer guarantees on behalf of their Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOSs) / Joint Ventures (JVs), under the Automatic Route and issue of personal, collateral and third party guarantees requires prior approval of Reserve Bank and is considered by RBI, on a case by case basis. With a view to simplify the procedure, it has now been decided to enlarge the scope of guarantees covered under the Automatic Route. Accordingly, Indian entities may offer any forms of guarantee - corporate or personal / primary or collateral / guarantee by the promoter company / guarantee by group company, sister concern or associate company in India, provided that : a) All 'financial commitments' including all forms of guarantees are within the overall prescribed ceiling for overseas investment of the Indian party i.e. currently within 200% of the networth of the investing company (Indian party). b) No guarantee is 'open ended' i.e. the amount of the guarantee should be specified upfront, and c) As in the case of corporate guarantees, all guarantees are required to be reported to RBI, in Form ODR. It is clarified that Guarantees issued by banks in India in favour of WOSs / JVs outside India, would be outside this ceiling and would be subject to prudential norms issued by RBI from time to time. 3. General Permission for disinvestment Currently, in terms of Regulation 16 of Notification No. FEMA120/RB-2004 dated 7th July 2004 , as amended from time to time, all disinvestments that involve a 'write off' i.e. where the amount repatriated on disinvestment is less than the amount of the original investment, need prior approval of the Reserve Bank. In order to enable companies to have operational flexibility according to their commercial judgment, it has been decided to further liberalise the Automatic Route of disinvestment. Accordingly, Indian parties may disinvest without prior approval of the Reserve Bank, in the undernoted categories. i) in cases where the JV / WOS is listed in the overseas stock exchange. ii) in cases where the Indian promoter company is listed on a stock exchange in India and has a networth of not less than Rs.100 crore. iii) where the Indian promoter is an unlisted company and the investment in overseas venture does not exceed USD 10 million. The Indian party is required to submit details of the disinvestment through its designated Authorised Dealer bank within 30 days from the date of disinvestment. 4. Overseas Investments - Proprietorship concerns In terms of Notification No. FEMA120/RB-2004 dated 7th July 2004 , as amended from time to time, only a company incorporated in India, or a body created under an Act of Parliament or a partnership firm registered under Indian Partnership Act, 1932, or any other entity as may be notified by the Reserve Bank is eligible to invest in a JV/WOS abroad. With a view to enabling recognised star exporters with a proven track record and a consistently high export performance to reap the benefits of globalization and liberalisation, it has been decided to allow proprietary / unregistered partnership firms to set up a JV/WOS outside India with prior approval of Reserve Bank. Proprietary / unregistered partnership firms satisfying the eligibility criteria as detailed in Annexure may submit an application in form ODI to the Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Department, Overseas Investment Division, Central Office, Amar Bhawan, 3 rd floor, Fort, Mumbai 400 001, through their Authorised Dealer bank. Authorised Dealer banks may accordingly, forward such investment proposals from the eligible parties, with their comments / recommendations, to the Reserve Bank for consideration. Approval of such investment would be subject to the usual reporting mechanism. 5. Necessary amendments to the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Any Foreign Security), Regulations, 2004 are being issued separately. 6. Authorised Dealer banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned. 7. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under Sections 10 (4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 (42 of 1999) and is without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law. Yours faithfully, Vinay Baijal Chief General Manager ANNEX [Annex to A. P. DIR (Series) Circular No.29 dated March 27, 2006] Criteria for considering investment proposals outside India by established proprietorship or unregistered partnership exporter firms i) The Partnership / Proprietorship firm is a DGFT recognised Star Export House (export exceeding Rs.15 crore) per annum. ii) The Authorised Dealer bank is satisfied that the exporter is KYC (Know Your Customer) compliant, is engaged in the proposed business and has turnover as indicated. iii) Exporter has proven track record i.e. export outstanding does not exceed 10 per cent of the average export realisation of preceding three years. iv) The exporter has not come under adverse notice of any Government agency like Enforcement Directorate, CBI and does not appear in the exporters' caution list of the Reserve Bank or in the list of defaulters to the banking system in India. v) The amount of investment outside India does not exceed 10 per cent of the average of three year export realisation or 200 per cent of the net owned funds of the firm, whichever is lower.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2005-06/338 · issued 27 Mar 2006. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=2795&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗