India’s cost-to-income ratio — how efficiently the banks are run
The chart shows the system-wide cost-to-income ratio (%) by fiscal year. The table below carries the same figures so the page is readable without JavaScript — for accessibility and AI answer engines.
Cost-to-income ratio — operating expenses as a share of net total income (%)
| Fiscal year | Cost-to-income | Note |
| FY21 | ~47% | Pandemic year; controlled opex but softer income keeps the ratio mid-40s |
| FY22 | ~47% | Recovery in income broadly matched by rising tech & staff costs |
| FY23 | ~48% | Wage revisions, branch & digital investment nudge costs up |
| FY24 | ~48% | Strong income from wider margins offsets higher operating spend |
| FY25 | ~48% | Efficiency broadly stable; deposit-cost pressure caps income gains |
Metric: operating expenses as a share of net total income (net interest income + other income) of scheduled commercial banks (RBI Report on Trend & Progress / FSR & bank disclosures). All figures are rounded and approximate; the exact ratio varies by bank, by bank group and by the income definition used, and recent years are provisional and revised. For exact latest figures see the source linked below.
By bank group — private vs public-sector (latest, approximate)
| Bank group | Cost-to-income | Why |
| Public-sector banks | ~49% | Large scale, but high wage & pension costs |
| Private banks | ~45% | Leaner cost base, heavier tech & branch-expansion spend |
| System (all SCBs) | ~48% | Weighted blend of the two groups |
Bank-group figures are illustrative and approximate, blended across banks within each group; individual banks vary widely. Private banks often run a leaner ratio despite heavier technology and branch-expansion spend, while public-sector banks carry larger employee and pension costs against their scale.
What it means for bankers
The cost-to-income ratio is the efficiency lens that sits between income and profit. A bank can grow income through wider net interest margins or stronger fee income, but if operating costs — staff, branches, technology, compliance — rise just as fast, none of it reaches the bottom line. That is why the ratio is watched alongside return on assets and the broader health scorecard: for a given income, a lower cost-to-income ratio directly lifts profitability. The pressure point now is funding cost: as the repo-rate cycle feeds through and the CASA share drifts down, deposit costs climb and cap income growth, so banks lean harder on cost discipline — digitisation, branch rationalisation and process automation — to keep the ratio in check. The persistent gap between leaner private banks and public-sector banks is one of the clearest structural differences in Indian banking, and closing it is a recurring theme in public-sector-bank reform.
India cost-to-income ratio FAQ
Methodology & sources: see how BankPulse dashboards are sourced, verified & updated · machine-readable cost-to-income JSON feed.