HomeCirculars › RBI/2007-08/319

Settling Claims for Missing Persons: RBI Guidelines for Co-op Banks

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-08/319 · issued FY 2007-08 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI directs co-operative banks to settle missing person claims per Indian Evidence Act Sections 107/108. Banks must set a policy, seek legal opinion, and may fix a threshold for simplified settlement using FIR, non-traceable report, and indemnity letter.

What changed

RBI clarified that claims for missing persons must follow Indian Evidence Act Sections 107 and 108. Banks are now advised to formulate a policy for such claims, considering legal opinion and case-specific facts. Additionally, banks may set a threshold limit for simplified settlement without full documentation, using only FIR, non-traceable report, and indemnity letter.

What it means for you

Co-operative banks must now have a formal policy for handling missing person claims, reducing ambiguity. This allows faster settlement for smaller claims, easing customer hardship, but requires banks to assess risk and set internal thresholds. Banks need to balance legal compliance with customer convenience.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

State and District Central Co-operative Banks, Nominees and legal heirs of missing persons, Bank legal and compliance teams

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is the legal basis for settling missing person claims?

Claims are governed by Sections 107 and 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 108 allows presumption of death after seven years of being missing, but a court order is needed.

Can we settle small claims without a court order?

Yes, RBI allows banks to set a threshold limit for simplified settlement using only FIR, non-traceable report, and indemnity letter, subject to risk management.

What documents are needed for simplified settlement?

For claims within the bank's threshold, you need the FIR, a non-traceable report from police, and a letter of indemnity from the claimant.

📜 This document’s life story (2 recorded events, each backed by RBI’s own words)
Clarified by Settlement of Claims for Missing Persons in Uttarakhand Disaster
RBI’s words: “the provisions of Circular RPCD.CO.RF.BC.No.70/07.38.01/2007-08 dated May 14, 2008 on ‘Settlement of claims in respect of missing persons’ would be applicable in other cases”
Repealed by RBI/2025-26/100 — Consolidation of Regulations — Withdrawal of circulars (28 Nov 2025)
RBI’s words: “Official withdrawal register entry #2248: RPCD.CO.RF.BC.No.70/07.38.01/2007-08 — "Settlement of Claims in respect of Missing Persons" dated May 14, 2008”
📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2007-08/319 RPCD.CO.RF.BC.No.70/07.38.01/2007-08 May14, 2008 All State and District Central Co-operative Banks Dear Sir, Settlement of claims in respect of missing persons A query has been raised regarding the system which should be followed by banks in case a claim is received from a nominee / legal heirs for settlement of claim in respect of missing persons. 2. The settlement of claims in respect of missing persons would be governed by the provisions of Section 107 / 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 107 deals with presumption of continuance and Section 108 deals with presumption of death. As per the provisions of Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, presumption of death can be raised only after a lapse of seven years from the date of his/her being reported missing. As such, the nominee / legal heirs have to raise an express presumption of death of the subscriber under Section 107/108 of the Indian Evidence Act before a competent court. If the court presumes that he/she is dead, then the claim in respect of a missing person can be settled on the basis of the same. 3. Banks are advised to formulate a policy which would enable them to settle the claims of a missing person after considering the legal opinion and taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case. Further, keeping in view the imperative need to avoid inconvenience and undue hardship to the common person, banks are advised that keeping in view their risk management systems, they may fix a threshold limit, up to which claims in respect of missing persons could be settled without insisting on production of any documentation other than (i) FIR and the non-traceable report issued by police authorities and (ii) letter of indemnity. Yours faithfully (B.P.Vijayendra) Chief General Manager
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2007-08/319 · issued FY 2007-08. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related
Topics: Co-operative Banks
Key dataSee the live numbers behind this topic: RBI Penalty Tracker, NPA / Asset-Quality Tracker — updated from official RBI data.
Key termsPlain-English definitions of terms in this circular — see the full Indian banking glossary. KYC / AML · Gross NPA (GNPA) · Deposit insurance (DICGC) · Scheduled Commercial Bank (SCB)

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 05 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=4184&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗