HomeCirculars › RBI/2010-11/200

PMLA Second Amendment Rules 2010: Obligations for Payment System Operators

No longer current — withdrawn, no replacement on file yet
Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/200 · issued 15 Sep 2010 · ~2 min read
Quick answerRBI mandates all payment system operators to comply with the Prevention of Money-laundering (Second Amendment) Rules, 2010, effective June 16, 2010. Key obligations include identifying beneficial owners, ongoing due diligence, and reporting transactions linked to terrorism financing.

What changed

The Government of India amended the Prevention of Money-laundering Rules, 2005, via notification dated June 16, 2010. The amendment inserts an explanation that transactions involving financing of terrorism include those linked to terrorists or terrorist organizations. It also replaces sub-rules (1A) and (1B) of rule 9, requiring entities to identify beneficial owners and exercise ongoing due diligence on client transactions.

What it means for you

Payment system operators must now explicitly treat any transaction suspected of funding terrorism as a reportable activity under PMLA. The enhanced due diligence requirements mean banks and intermediaries need to verify beneficial ownership and continuously monitor transactions against client risk profiles. Non-compliance could lead to regulatory action under the PMLA framework.

Historical instruction — do not use for current compliance. This is what was required at the time; it no longer reflects current RBI requirements. If no replacement rule is linked above, that only means none is recorded on our register yet — it does not prove no later applicable rule exists. Confirm on the official RBI source below.

What banks were required to do at the time

Who it affects

All entities authorized to operate payment systems in India, Banking companies, Financial institutions, Intermediaries

❓ Common questions

Regulatory timeline

Built from our lineage records — each fact carries its provenance; missing history simply is not shown (never guessed).

What is the key change introduced by the Second Amendment Rules, 2010?

The amendment adds an explanation that transactions involving financing of terrorism include those linked to terrorists or terrorist organizations. It also mandates entities to identify beneficial owners and exercise ongoing due diligence on client transactions.

When did these rules come into effect?

The rules came into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, which was June 16, 2010.

Who is responsible for compliance with these rules?

All entities authorized to operate payment systems in India, including banking companies, financial institutions, and intermediaries, must comply with the amended rules.

📜 Read the original circular — full text as issued by RBI
RBI/2010-11/200 DPSS.CO.AD.No.552/02.27.004/2010-2011 September 15, 2010 All the entities Authorized to operate Payment Systems in India Madam/Dear Sir Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Second Amendment Rules, 2010-obligation of entities authorized to operate Payment System in India Government of India vide its Notification No.10/2010-E.S/F. No.6/8/2009-E.S. dated June 16, 2010 has amended the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Rules, 2005. A copy of the Notification is enclosed for information and necessary compliance. Please acknowledge the receipt. Yours faithfully (K. Sivaraman) General Manager Encl: as above MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 16th June, 2010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: EXTRAORDINARY Part II- Sec. 3 (i) G.S.R. 508(E)- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section(1) read with clause(h), clause(i), clause(j) clause(k) of sub- section 2 of section 73 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), the Central Government , in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Rules, 2005, namely :- 1. (1) These rules may be called Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Second Amendment Rules, 2010. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. In the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Rules, 2005:- (a) in rule 2 in sub-rule (1), after clause (g), the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely:- "Explanation:- Transaction involving financing of the activities relating to terrorism includes transaction involving funds suspected to be linked or related to, or to be used for terrorism, terrorist act or by a terrorist, terrorist organisation or those who finance or are attempting to financing of terrorism." (b) in rule 9, for sub- rule (1A), the following sub- rule shall be substituted, namely:- "(1A) Every banking company, financial institution and Intermediary, as the case may be, shall determine whether a client is acting on behalf of a beneficial owner, identify the beneficial owner and take all reasonable steps to verify his identity." (c) in rule 9, for sub- rule (1B), the following sub - rule shall be substituted, namely:- "(1B) Every banking company, financial institution and Intermediary, as the case may be, shall exercise ongoing due diligence with respect to the business relationship with every client and closely examine the transactions in order to ensure that they are consistent with their knowledge of the client, his business and risk profile and where necessary, the source of funds." (d) in rule 9, for sub- rule (1C), the following sub- rule shall be substituted, namely:- "(1C) No banking company, financial institution and Intermediary, as the case may be, shall allow the opening of or keep any anonymous account or account in fictitious names or account on behalf of other persons whose identity has not been disclosed or cannot be verified." (e) in rule 9, after sub -rule (1C), the following sub- rule shall be inserted, namely:- "(1D) When there are suspicions of money laundering or financing of the activities relating to terrorism or where there are doubts about the adequacy or veracity of previously obtained customer identification data, every banking company, financial institution and Intermediary shall review the due diligence measures including verifying again the identity of the client and obtaining information on the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship, as the case may be." (f) in rule 10, after sub- rule (3), the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely:- "Explanation: For the purpose of this rule:- (i) the expression 'records of the identity of clients' shall include records of the identification data, account files and business correspondence. (ii) the expression 'cessation of the transactions' means termination of an account or business relationship." [Notification No. 10/2010- E. S. / F. No. 6/8/2009-E.S.] S. R. MEENA, Under Secretary Note - The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India , Extraordinary, Part II , Section 3 , sub- section (i) vide number G.S.R. 444( E), dated the 1 st July 2005 and subsequently amended by G.S.R.717( E) dated the 13 th December 2005, G.S.R. 389( E) dated the 24 th May, 2007, G.S.R. 816(E) dated the 12 th November 2009 and G.S.R. 76( E) dated the 12 th February 2010.
Reproduced for reference with acknowledgment — Source: Reserve Bank of India · RBI/2010-11/200 · issued 15 Sep 2010. The plain-English explanation above is BankPulse’s own independent summary.
🧰 Tools — save, print, templates & related

💬 Banker Discussion

Discuss this circular with fellow bankers — reply, upvote what helps, report what doesn’t belong. Be professional; no client data. Views are the commenter’s own, not BankPulse’s.

Loading comments…
BankPulse Compliance Evidence Pack — generated 03 Aug 2026 · status cross-checked against RBI’s official withdrawal register (refreshed weekly).
Official RBI source: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=5992&Mode=0 — Plain-English summary by BankPulse (bankpulse.ai), reviewed by our expert reviewer, CA Amit Jain. Independent platform, not affiliated with the Reserve Bank of India; is our own plain-English paraphrase, not RBI’s original wording.
Public beta — plain-English informational summaries. Always verify against the official RBI source (circular number cited on every page) before making compliance, credit, treasury, audit, or operational decisions. · Join our WhatsApp channel ↗